this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
173 points (88.8% liked)

politics

19146 readers
3289 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vice.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PunnyName 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like the "Jewish space lasers" bullshit that Margarine Traitor Greed mentioned.

[–] TokenBoomer 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we had space lasers, we’d use them in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Jews won't use their space lasers to help Ukraine because Ukraine is full of Nazis. /s

[–] TokenBoomer 0 points 1 year ago

Flawless logic.

[–] FormerlyChucks 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But that would put the US into direct conflict with Russia. Military lasers are definitely a thing

[–] SulaymanF 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They don’t exist at the magnitude you think. We don’t have space lasers that can attack ground targets yet and probably never will. At best they can jam certain systems like drones.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean we could, but we’d secretly have to get four battery modules each the size of the international space station into orbit.

[–] Eldritch 3 points 1 year ago

Only for solid state lasers. There are other kinds though. But they would still be fairly impractical and heavy to have in orbit. And wouldn't be good for much more than one shot

[–] FormerlyChucks 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you underestimate current military capabilities which are decades beyond public knowledge tech.

[–] SulaymanF 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Physics does have some solid limits though. The amount of power required for lasers to travel miles through atmosphere is massive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

But if it's the same space lasers they are using on Maui that nobody seems to be able to detect it's source, then wouldn't the same thing apply if they used it on Russia?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hey, those are real! /s