this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
196 points (91.2% liked)

politics

18641 readers
3772 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A good in-depth discussion of media bias in political reporting, or why is it that Biden voters are encouraged to understand an empathize with Trump voters but Trump voters are never asked to understand Biden voters?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YoBuckStopsHere 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd vote for Biden over anyone the GOP is running.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’d vote for Biden over anyone the GOP is running.

I'll die of old age before I vote R for any position at any level. They can't possibly reform themselves enough to be trusted in my lifetime.

If I see an R candidate running who doesn't seem like a whackjob I'm going to assume it's a trojan horse. They spent the past several years trying to convince me that they are a bunch of crazy bigots who will destroy civil liberties, destroy our educational system, and ban any history or books that they deem as undesirable. I have chosen to believe them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gotta watch out for the trojan horses running on the Democrat side as well. RFK Jr. being the perfect example.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Agree, but he's blatantly obvious.

[–] Feathercrown 2 points 1 year ago

If RFK is a trojan horse he's made of glass. But yes always be wary of these things

[–] TipRing 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is Sinema running for President? Because that would be a hilarious trash fire of a campaign to watch.

[–] dragontamer 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The Democrats went from racist southerners in 1960s to the modern progressives who literally drafted Civil Rights laws by the end of that decade.

The only thing that's certain in politics is change. Its surprising how quickly viewpoints can change, even for large, established parties.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Democrats went from racist southerners in 1960s to the modern progressives who literally drafted Civil Rights laws by the end of that decade.

I've chosen this link about the Southern Strategy because it will both debunk the overly simplistic view of it that is normally put forth, and also will debunk the usual attempts by conservatives to say it didn't happen.

I've cherrypicked this bit from its closing paragraph because I think it gets at the meat of this argument, but I also acknowledge here that the overall point of the article is that we can't ahem blame the current state of the Republican party entirely on the Southern Strategy and racism.

While the claim that the appeal of the parties on the basis of racial issues switched following the passage of the Civil Rights Act is true enough, there is a greater truth that conservatives who resist this claim often make which deserves to be acknowledged: the South changed its racial attitudes over time. It has changed, just as America has changed. Whether its overarching racial culture has changed nearly enough to meet the higher aspirations of our ideals of racial equality today is a separate question. But the South that the Republican Party represents today is not the South of George Wallace and the neo-segregationists.

Edited to add: And also, if Republicans stop being the party of hurting people I'll stop treating them like the party of hurting people. I stand by my original statement though. It's so exceptionally unlikely as to be within the realm of fiction that they will do such a thing during my natural lifespan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's more like parties switched bases; see Nixon's Southern Strategy:

As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as presidential candidate Richard Nixon and Senator Barry Goldwater developed strategies that successfully contributed to the political realignment of many white, conservative voters in the South who had traditionally supported the Democratic Party. It also helped to push the Republican Party much more to the right relative to the 1950s. By winning all of the south a presidential candidate could obtain the presidency with minimal support elsewhere.