this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1335 points (96.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35511 readers
1254 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Went to a restaurant in LA today and when I got the check I noticed that it was a bit higher than it should be. Then I noticed this 18% service charge. So... We, as customers, need to help pay for their servers instead of the owners paying their servers a living wage. And on top of that they have suggested tip. I called bs on this. I will bet you that the servers do not see a dime of this 18% service charge. [deleted a word so it wasn't a grammatical horror to read]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They definitely have it in other California cities too. And not just in restaurants.

A chain resale/consignment hipster shop in NorCal started adding a percentage service charge years ago with the same excuse, and you'd only find out about it if you looked at your receipt. The fucked up part is that they also raised their prices so high that I couldn't shop there anymore. It's one of those buy/sell/trade clothing stores, so the whole point was to pay less for decent clothes. But if they're already raising prices significantly, why the fuck do they need yet another charge to pay their workers.

I also think they really must believe it makes them seem "progressive" somehow. Like "oh look, we're on the workers' side!" and they hope no one eating/shopping there will think about it any more deeply than that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't say "on the worker's side" though. It says anti-consumer and selfish. They're not willing to pay any more if it means they make a little less, they're just comfortable taking more money from other people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You realize 100% of the money they’d use to pay their workers more would come from consumers right?

[–] aesthelete 4 points 1 year ago

It could come from profit margin, but that would require the higher ups to not be greedy assholes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Of course it would. It doesn't have to (Dan Price is an example of a different model), but it would. At least by wrapping it into the prices consumers can clearly see that increase, instead of this shoddily hidden tactic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Buffalo Exchange?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The alternative is that they just jack up the menu prices to accomplish the same thing. This is just the equivalent of pricing things at $19.99 because people don't understand that really means $20 which sounds like a lot more money.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is just the equivalent of pricing things at $19.99 because people don’t understand that really means $20 which sounds like a lot more money.

So let's say you checkout at the grocery store tomorrow and your $100 of groceries has a $20 "employee wellness" fee tacked on. You see that and pricing an item 1 penny below a round number as the same thing. Really?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you'd leave the store having paid $120 for groceries with no wellness fee tacked on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did that make sense in your head?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, and in reality. When you charge more per item for goods and services so that healthcare is included, they cost more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, and in reality. When you charge more per item for goods and services so that healthcare is included, they cost more.

A red-herring response if I've ever seen one.

This has literally nothing to do with the tactic of hiding additional fees so customers don't see them instead of just increasing prices, or the difference between pricing something a cent below a round number and adding a wellness fee at checkout.

I try to avoid playing pigeon chess, but it seems that's what I've been doing.

[–] roboticide 2 points 1 year ago

No, because the difference of seeing a $19.99 price versus a $20.00 price is that I see it up front. That's more honest than tacking on a $21.50 hidden fee after the fact.

[–] linearchaos 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, please if you're going to charge me 40 bucks for a salad just put 40 bucks on the menu. Or 39.99 If you must. I greatly prefer that over listing the salad as $30 on the menu, only get blindsided by a separate $10 service charge on the bill. Matter of fact can we just go to putting the entire cost of the item on the menu?

Everything should be on the wheel and out the door pricing. Doing any other way is absolute bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You'll get no disagreement from me!