this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
89 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

7348 readers
771 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
89
Should lying in the House of Commons be punished? (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As our government becomes more and more polarized, what can we do to ensure that facts and data hold out?

I'm not suggesting that lying should be illegal (in fact, it's often unintentional), but when an MPs statement can later be proven to be false, shouldn't they be forced to publicly apologize?

The truth shouldn't be political.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It became false once more data became available.. How do you deal with that, when you need to deal with a situation with partial information?

It's not like they meant to lie about it, then had to make a decision and you can't always make the right choice when you're missing data.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hey, that's fine.

"We did the best with what we had and we now know that to have been the wrong decision"

But again, decisions aren't facts. Misrepresenting facts should be decoupled from the resulting decision.