this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
842 points (99.2% liked)

News

23014 readers
4465 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billbasher 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you buy the hardware you should be able to turn it on. Jail breaking is fully moral in that situation.

The self driving is software that uses the hardware so should be paid for IMO. You should also be able to use your own software that’s open source on the hardware you own

[–] cley_faye 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Running your own software to control the automotive part of a car is probably not legal, since I assume the process of making a car street legal should requires an audit of said system.

Hmm, well, I hope it is the case, anyway.

[–] schroedingershat 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any software that passes whatever local safety standard should be installable (or software that doesn't pass if the car is not being used on public roads).

Otherwise the car is not being sold, it's being rented, and all the advertising that says anything about buying is fraud.

[–] induna_crewneck 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good luck getting a homebrew OS for tesla cars to pass those tests. I don't even know how that would work. I'd be curious to know what would happen if you would try to register and get a car through the TÜV for example that runs on custom firmware.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole internet runs on a homebrew os.

[–] induna_crewneck 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does that even mean and how is it relevant here? "The internet" isn't a car or piece of hardware.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well-developed software built by professionals to industry standards and capable of doing a very important job effectively. And homebrew. You might be surprised at what sufficiently motivated nerds are capable of.

[–] induna_crewneck 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im sorry, I still don't know what you're talking about. What about the internet runs on homebrew and how is it related to cars?

[–] Blissingg 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might not understand what homebrew in a software sense is then full stop. Homebrew in software just means not commercially made/backed.

GNU/Linux and plenty of other open source projects that power your modern life and the internet started the same way.

[–] induna_crewneck 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Homebrew software is unofficial/non-commercial software for systems which were originally set up with proprietary software (like gaming console or in this case car OSs).

[–] Blissingg 1 points 1 year ago

That’s the definition for games consoles specifically, I know you pulled it from wiki :)

Every computer that comes preinstalled with windows also falls under your definition though as does any Mac.

Linux was also developed for or spurned by a system that was proprietary and only for educational purposes MINIX.

[–] schroedingershat 1 points 1 year ago

It's similarly hard to make an airbag or seat belt, but you can still undo the bolt without the manufacturer in another country bricking your car without any considerations of your local laws.

[–] Jilanico 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if your own self driving software causes an accident/death?

[–] Mindlight 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if Teslas own self driving software causes an accident/death?

[–] Jilanico 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tesla is subject to some oversight by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. They recently forced a recall when they weren't satisfied with Tesla's software.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-recalls-362000-us-vehicles-over-full-self-driving-software-2023-02-16/

Maybe not ideal, but better than nothing I suppose. What oversight is a homebrew software alternative subject to?

[–] Mindlight 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Does Teslas still have a disclaimer that the self-driving features aren't self-driving and that if the driver is using the self driving features and there is an accident Tesla can't be held liable?

[–] Jilanico -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Mindlight 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it doesn't matter whatever you're using Teslas or a 3rd party software since you, as the driver, are responsible for the outcome.

[–] Jilanico 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it was a matter of installing software on a laptop or phone, I'd agree with you, but installing software on a vehicle that can run over people is another matter, disclaimer or not.

Just like some cars are street legal and some cars are not, some software should be street legal and some software not. If the 3rd party software has been cleared by regulators for your Tesla, I'd be fine with it.

[–] Mindlight 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're claiming the software in Teslas have been tested and approved by the authorities?

[–] Jilanico -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You didn't read the article I linked? Seems they do it after the fact, which is sus imo, but authorities are exerting some level of oversight.

[–] Mindlight 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did read it. They opened an investigation like 5 years after The Model S was released and people have died. Now, 6 years after that, something actually happens. 6 years of more accidents.

The same could be done with 3rd party software so there's no difference and it's not the same as the car system being regularly inspected.

[–] Jilanico 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't followed it closely to know all the deets, but some action being taken is better than none. I'm not out here defending Tesla or current government policies. I do believe that if I have to pass a driving test to operate a vehicle, then whatever self-driving software is installed should do the same.

If you're trying to convince me that anyone should be able to take any random self driving software they found on the Internet, install it, and let it go wild on public streets, we're going to have to agree to disagree.

[–] Mindlight 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems you are trying to prove that "random software" is unsafe compared to Tesla's when you actually have no idea how safe Tesla's is.

There are multiple companies and universities developing software for self driving cars.

What if the "random software" was developed and maintained by Volvo, would you still call it "random software"? Would you still claim that Tesla's software is more safe to use?

[–] Jilanico 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope, if you look at a previous comment of mine in this thread, you'd see I'm fine with 3rd party software as long as it's been approved by regulators. Same goes for Tesla's software - if it hasn't been approved by regulators prior to deployment on the streets, I'm against it.

[–] Mindlight 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're not fine with Tesla's even?

Since there is no such testing you're talking about.

[–] Jilanico 1 points 1 year ago

Nope, not fine with that. And you're right, the US has no testing. The EU however does regulate it and has not approved Tesla's self-driving feature.

Interesting article on that: https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/12/23339219/us-auto-regulation-type-approval-self-certification-av-tesla