this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
338 points (95.2% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
4381 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gmtom 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What has Biden done to be a war criminal?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"war crime is when war I don't like and the more I don't like it the war crime-y-er it is" - average person discussing war crimes of modern presidents

For the record, Bush is guilty of legitimate war crimes (sanctioning the torture of PoWs) and crimes against peace (the unprovoked and unjustified invasion of Iraq), and Trump is quite possibly guilty of war crimes (his advocacy of 'killing the families' of enemy combatants combined with the fact that he removed the transparency from our drone strike program is... suspicious, to say the least) but shit will leak out from that administration for years to come yet.

~~Obama and~~ Biden probably do not count as war criminals. Killing enemy combatants is legally unproblematic. However, the acceptance of high collateral damage and relatively low certainty of identification may qualify them, depending on how you see the matter of drone strikes vs. traditional methods. It would be a much tougher sell at the Hague.

EDIT: It was pointed out below that Obama is more likely a war criminal due to the approval of legally dubious 'double-tap' drone strikes which presume first responders to militants are militants themselves.

[–] gmtom 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“war crime is when war I don’t like and the more I don’t like it the war crime-y-er it is” - average person discussing war crimes of modern presidents

Literally.

Obama and Biden probably do not count as war criminals

Obama is definitely a war criminal. For the Kunduz hospital strike, or if you think he's not responsible for that personally, then for his approval of "double tap" drone strikes, where after the first drone strike on people they suspect might be terrorists they would wait for first responders to come help, and then send another strike on them assuming they are also terrorists, despite international law stating they must assume people are non combatants until they can prove otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obama is definitely a war criminal. For the Kunduz hospital strike,

I don't really see how that incident is on him.

or if you think he’s not responsible for that personally, then for his approval of “double tap” drone strikes, where after the first drone strike on people they *suspect might_ be terrorists they would wait for first responders to come help, and then send another strike on them assuming they are also terrorists, despite international law stating they must assume people are non combatants until they can prove otherwise.

Yeah, that's much more likely to make him a war criminal.

[–] gmtom 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The idea being that as the leader of the country the buck stops with him. But I acknowledged that not everyone will view it that way, and included the other, less debatable example too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The idea being that as the leader of the country the buck stops with him.

That the buck stops with him doesn't make him personally responsible for every decision made by people under his command. If that was the case, it would be literally impossible to not be a criminal in any position of power - if GI Joe chooses to drive drunk on a Saturday night, that nets you a DUI. 'The buck stops here' means that the president must ultimately take responsibility for the decision-making that comes to his desk. It doesn't mean "GI Joe's DUI is your DUI", it means "When GI Joe's DUI comes to your desk, what you decide cannot be blamed on anyone else - this is your duty to make the big decisions and own up to what happens."

In the Kunduz hospital strike, that meant a rare admission of guilt from the US government and reparations. If you think that's not enough - then the buck stops with Obama. It's his fault that more was not done in response to the incident. But the strike itself was not ordered or authorized by him, and can't be reasonably blamed on him simply because he's the CiC.

[–] gmtom 2 points 1 year ago

I get your side of this, I'm not arguing against you dude.

[–] Diprount_Tomato -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What all US presidents have been doing for a long time

[–] gmtom 5 points 1 year ago

This isn't answering the question. And suggests you don't actually know and are just regurgitating rhetoric without actually understanding it.