this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
941 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
576 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

๐Ÿ Meta

๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories

๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics

๐Ÿ Social / Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
941
BBC is starting its own Mastodon instance. The CBC should do the same. (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As it says in the title, the BBC is starting its own Mastodon instance. I think the CBC (and other news networks) should do similar. Particularly with the recent passing of Bill C-18 it seems like a world where the links we share are crossposts to news organization's own content is the perfect resolution to that whole issue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] voluble 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they always seem a bit too reluctant to lead

I know it's a cliche, but I wonder if that's a 'Canadian' thing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe? I think it's also because they're constantly under attack from conservatives. Anything too progressive or new could make them stand out more as a target. "The Fediverse?! Look what the Liberal CBC is doing with taxpayer money now!" It's maybe put them in a box where they think they can only do whatever other news or media organizations are doing.

I also think they probably underestimate the amount of support they have from Canadians too.

[โ€“] voluble 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, could be. I'd like to see funding for the CBC maintained, and think it's so valuable to have a national broadcaster. At the same time, can I take a moment to bellyache about CBC radio? Some of their programming makes me a bit sad. Like having a show that simply repeats podcasts produced by other people, occasionally about American news stories. There's no reason for that to be on the airwaves in 2023. Programs like The Sunday Edition, and Writers and Company are gone, and it seems like a lot of the spoken word programs are in the weeds on fringe issues. It's just not the first preset on my dial anymore. And it's too bad because I used to really look forward to tuning in. Maybe radio is dying, I don't know.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thereโ€™s no reason for that to be on the airwaves in 2023.

Why's that? A radio show that curates the best of other radio shows is a perfectly fine use of the medium. In fact, it makes a lot of sense as if you like listening to one radio show you will probably like listening to others as well.

Programs like The Sunday Edition, and Writers and Company are gone

Huh? Writers and Company is still there, and is streamed to legacy devices on Sunday at 3PM.

Maybe radio is dying, I donโ€™t know.

Quite the opposite. It is alive and well. That show you spoke of earlier being able to regularly find new content from other radio programs to present to the audience is telling about just how strong radio is. If radio was dying, that show would have died long ago.

[โ€“] voluble 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Speaking specifically about the 'Podcast Playlist' show - while I don't disagree that it can be an interesting nexus for new information, I don't think it needs to be on the air at all. If the objective is curation, that could easily and more effectively be done via an online feed where the shows are actually hyperlinked, tagged, & made accessible. I'm not a radio producer so, grain of salt. But from my armchair, seems to me that the CBC should aspire to something higher than 'content aggregation' or rebroadcasting material from other stations. I expect that sort of thing from a donation funded campus & community radio station where maybe someone isn't in the booth at 2am, but not from a national broadcaster that receives funding from Canadian taxpayers.

With Writers & Company, I was referring to the host stepping down. I don't know about you, but in my opinion, she kind of was the show in a sense. AFAIK there won't be any new episodes, and that's a loss.

More broadly, I like that Canada has a national broadcaster, I just think it could be better.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the objective is curation, that could easily and more effectively be done via an online feed

Well, it is, just like every other CBC Radio program. Podcasts is the business they are in.

The OTA broadcast is there merely to stream the same content out to legacy devices which are not compatible with the modern feeds. If it were a campus/community run venture, even if it were a commercially run venture, they would no doubt only offer the feed, but as they have taxpayer support they are also able to accommodate those who are unable or unwilling to adopt newer devices.

Now, maybe there is a case to be made that the program isn't worth producing for any medium, but I don't have listenership data to delve into that. It would not surprise me if a lot of people enjoy it, though. It seems far less niche than Writers and Company. Assuming it is well received, that is a pretty good reason to produce it.

she kind of was the show in a sense.

Fair. Hard to lament someone wanting to move on with their life, though. That show has been on the air seemingly forever. It is not like Podcast Playlist is displacing it. They have been produced in parallel. Its actual replacement is yet to come โ€“ and it might be even better!