this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
491 points (91.4% liked)

Political Memes

5611 readers
1283 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (8 children)

If this is what a fake libertarian is, there's no such thing as a real one. This is every single libertarian I've ever conversed with.

[–] Action_Bastid 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You need to find yourself some Left-Libertarians.

You're usually looking for some type of Georgists or some flavor of small-scale Social/Communist Anarchy. Most of them are way more able to grok the concepts of things like "natural monopolies" or "Tragedy of the Commons" and other fun market failure states. They tend to focus more on the existence of the market itself as a tool for creating competition that drives innovation and efficiency while giving less lip service to the idea that just because you accumulated a bunch of capital from an idea that's its a good idea.

If I scam a bunch of people, I've gathered a bunch of capital, but that doesn't mean I've actually produced anything of value for anyone. If I refined chemicals in my house and dumped all the waste in my neighbor's pool, I'm not actually competing in an even market, because I've burdened my neighbor with the cost of waste remediation while I get to keep all the profit.

[–] MiddleWeigh 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't understand your point. Would you mind elaborating?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re usually looking for some type of Georgists

Georgism is actually a very interesting political philosophy. I hadn't heard of it before you mentioned it in your comment. Thank you for sharing!

“natural monopolies” or “Tragedy of the Commons”

These are, indeed, two very important, and critical issues. When one is advocating for libertarianism, capitalism, and the like, they mustn't be ignored.

If I refined chemicals in my house and dumped all the waste in my neighbor’s pool, I’m not actually competing in an even market, because I’ve burdened my neighbor with the cost of waste remediation while I get to keep all the profit.

This point doesn't actually hold much, if any, ground, as it is fundamentally at odds with the philosophy of libertariansim. Libertarianism is about equal freedom of the individual, yes, but that does not grant one the right to burden other's with un-consented cost.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I considered myself libertarian, I was not a fan of police brutality, pro LGBTQ rights, more open border, and legalized drugs. I still hold all of those views but have gotten a lot more to the left from am economics standpoint. A lot of that is die to my econ degree.

That said, post 2016 I definitely noticed a ton of faux libertarians who were very defensive of Trump. If you voted for Trump, I don't think you can consider yourself libertarian. I think I recall hearing that the whacko New Hampshire libertarians basically took over the party. Those guys are a bunch of racist fascists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you voted for Trump, I don’t think you can consider yourself libertarian.

I wouldn't go so far as to draw that line at voting, as one could certainly be voting strategically -- it's possible that they don't agree with many, if any, of Trump's policies, but they were of the belief that voting for Trump would push policy in a direction that would be in their interest -- this is, of course, a symptom of FPTP, and it could be possibly solved with a ranked ballot. That being said, I do completely agree that if one is a vehement supporter of Trump, and his policies in a similar fassion to the usual MAGA group, then they cannot call themselves a libertarian in good concience -- there are many policies of, and actions by Trump that are very un-libertarian.

[–] SupraMario 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This means you have never interacted with a libertarian then, just a ashamed conservative/republican wanting to be labeled something else.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 5 points 1 year ago

Everyone knows the True Libertarians hang out in Scotland. With the True Scotts.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (29 children)

Generally I lean libertarian in terms of pure individual choice. Worship no gods or a million, be single or marry 20 people at once, put whatever substance you want in your own body, kneel for the flag or shed a tear, yes I will use your pronouns.

Every man a king, that's my philosophy.

The rest of the stuff yeah. I want food stamp programs, I want a secular neutral state, I want antidiscrimination laws, I dont support a company dumping pollution on us.

[–] _wintermute 7 points 1 year ago (12 children)

You just described being a leftist. Why are libertarians so afraid of being put on the progressive left? You are not a libertarian lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For the sake of clarity in this conversation, would you mind defining "leftist"? It is rather ambiguous.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

How many have you talked to? I'm guessing the root cause is your sample size is too small.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 3 points 1 year ago

I can confirm the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, OP's argument is founded on a logical fallacy -- it is called a Faulty Generalization.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)