this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
2763 points (97.0% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3812 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nefonous -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't understand why people absolutely need to make everything about man vs woman.

If it was a male model those people would have written exactly the same. If tomorrow comes out an article saying the same thing about bred pitt everyone would be suspicious about that being fake too

Since the two jobs are so disconnected from each other it sounds unlikely and they assumed it was some clickbait fake post, that's all.

I'm absolutely for equality and against any discrimination against women or any other category, but making this into a gender battle is ridiculous

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Is it just a coincidence that it is all ~~men~~ male presenting pictures criticising her?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Probably not, but then again it would likely be all men in the alternative scenario above too. Why that is is a different discussion I guess

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Probably not, but then again it would likely be all men in the alternative scenario above too. Why that is is a different discussion I guess

[–] nefonous 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's not.

But as far as I know is an industry with a very strong make majority, isn't it?

And they would probably have said the same about a man

I'm not saying they are or aren't sexists, I'm just saying that that post doesn't prove anything other than they were idiots.

They are giving us enough reasons to hate on them without guessing reasons that could or could not be true

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

By saying they would have said that about a man, you’re implying that they’re not sexist, or that they are not sexist comments.

However, for some reason, (but not coincidence) four men have made stereotypical statements that an attractive woman cannot be intelligent enough to know how to be code.

The woman is stating this is a reflection of her lived experience in the male dominated industry.

But she must be lying, just because she has had to face these same comments her whole life, there must be some other reason for these particular comments???

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IMHO you're right! It's not (only!) about sexism, they make it themselves to sexism. It's more about the image that only ugly fat nerds are programmers and someone beautiful just doesn't fit in their little minds. Usually no one fucking cares what people like these think, but because of social media every eye is on those fucking desperate idiots and people feel the whole society thinks like this, what is completely wrong. To say that this is only coming from sexism is completely bullshit imho. Of course there are some, but it's not the only reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only a "battle" because of people like you insisting sexism doesn't exist

[–] nefonous 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where exactly did I say sexism doesn't exist?

I'm just saying that crying wolf doesn't help neither the cause nor a healthy discussion

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You're claiming people are finding sexism where none exists. This thread alone shows that the post is a magnet for sexism. It's not crying wolf. Your claim is a denial that it exists in at least one context where it's incredibly clearly a factor.

So yeah, I extrapolated your opinion to other cases like this. Probably because this attitude has been seen since sexism first became a concern in society. This thread, again, is illustrating that quite well.

[–] Jonna 1 points 1 year ago

Here's some data to demonstrate the existence of gender bias in coding:

"This paper presents the largest study to date on gender bias, where we compare acceptance rates of contributions from men versus women in an open source software community. Surprisingly, our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's. However, women's acceptance rates are higher only when they are not identifiable as women. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists" nonetheless.https://peerj.com/preprints/1733/