this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
56 points (98.3% liked)
worldnews
4867 readers
1 users here now
Rules:
-
Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.
-
No racism or bigotry.
-
Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.
-
Post titles should be the same as the article title.
-
No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.
Instance-wide rules always apply.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I am not describing the aftermath of a storm; I am describing a storm.
... violence. It ends in violence. Not all against the bastards responsible, and not necessarily great for anyone in the near term. Stop reading in some feel-good "nothing bad can come of this!" if you're so goddamn tired of hearing it, because I said nothing of the sort.
Who the fuck do you think is pointing to World War II as some just and fair sequence of events?
How has shortsighted thinking worked for us? Guess we shouldn't worry about climate change cause in the long run we are all dead.
Most likely Keynes wasn't thinking of existential threats to our civilization when he came up with that quote.
Right. Not like there was a rise of genocidal fascism going on at the time that threatened the entire continent of Europe, Russia, China, North Africa, the Middle East, and a belt from India to the Philippines. Meanwhile there was an aborted coup in the US, and labor riots with terrorist attacks so awful they should be classified as small revolutions. Plus a failure of economic/agricultural policy that left the majority of the US (by land) covered in a dust bowl sending refugees from Oklahoma to the rest.
Nope, none of this was happening. Let's keep with the short term thinking.
I believe I asked a question. Can you please answer it.