this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
465 points (98.9% liked)

politics

22045 readers
4535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The only people it's worth it for are the connected billionaires who can scoop up assets cheap while the rest of us end up as serfs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we believe that the democrats didn’t properly recognize or hear the very real economic anxiety that Americans felt prior to the election

The bothsiderists don't typically look at what the Republicans did or didn't do, except as a jumping off point to explain to everyone else how the Democrats are terrible at pretty much everything.

And certainly the unhinged base is so disconnected from reality that it would take quite a lot to wake them up, if it's possible at all. The same geniuses that could see all the same stats we could under the booming economy we just had up until January of this year, now proclaim, without even flinching that donvict was handed "the worse economy ever". We can all look at things like S&P take a gigantic downturn after donvict's stupid games with tariffs, but these guys blame that direct cause/effect on.....Biden. And people like Dollar Store Harry Potter Mike Johnson sit there and repeat the same brazen lie.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

bothsiderists

Pass state level electoral reform to reduce the influence of political parties and empower the citizenry with the ability to vote outside the 2 party system without a spoiler effect. Make sides less important then policy. Introduce competition into the electoral process.

Do I really have to sell more democracy? We should naturally gravitate towards more representative electoral systems. Democrats are self proclaimed democracy advocates right? STAR or Ranked choice voting should be right up their alley then.

It's obvious democrats understand the flaws of the voting system. I will refer you to nearly any political thread on lemmy during the previous election. Time and again people will reference the spoiler effect inherent with First-past-the-post voting. It is well understood then that the voting system is flawed. Why is there no urgency in changing how we vote?

Red states, I can understand why they would prefer and protect FPTP voting. What's up with the blue states? Why are they using the voting system republicans prefer? Seems like a ultragigagigantic red flag to me.

Electoral Reform Videos

First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

Videos on alternative electoral systems

STAR voting

Alternative vote

Ranked Choice voting

Range Voting

Single Transferable Vote

Mixed Member Proportional representation