this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
219 points (98.7% liked)

News

27425 readers
6417 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 130 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lmao the autopen issue is just that Biden used an electronic signature, so now the pardons are invalidated? Guess I don't own my house then, I'm not an organ donor, my student loans should be invalidated, my medical procedures were never authorized, etc...

[–] Death_Equity 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Under US law, the president has the expressed authority to direct a subordinate to attach the presidential signature in an official capacity without the president present while granting that individual no more authorities.

For the regular citizens, you have to be present or assign a lawful representative with legal authorities. So you couldn't tell your secretary to attach your electronic signature to your mortgage loan papers unless she had power of attorney or was acting as your guardian. You can click a button to attach your electronic signature and send the document to whomever.

So Biden was fine to sign without being present. I think their argument is that he was not capable of knowingly doing what he did due to mental condition. So they would have to prove he was unfit and determine when he crossed that line for whatever they are claiming to be valid and vacation possible.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

they would have to prove he was unfit

In this looney toons timeline? Most likely trump will just declare it is so and everyone goes along with it

[–] Death_Equity 0 points 17 hours ago

I honestly don't think it would be that hard to prove he was mentally compromised with a few subpoenas, or at least cast enough doubt. There was the staffers that talked about their wrangling efforts at the start of his term.

You are right though, Trump will do whatever and then the courts will glaciate their way through unfucking things.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Republicans canceling student loans would almost be cool but they'd probably find a way to destroy universities in the process if they could

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They're trying to seize control of universities, look at what's been happening with Columbia.

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 2 hours ago

With how universities are funded and boards are operated, they've owned them for a long time. What they've failed to control is the minds and hearts of students and professors.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

I think the universe would implode due to that specific action creating a paradox.

I mean, Republicans were the ones that cancelled free/cheap higher education.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably wouldn't do that, capitalists are heavily invested in Student Loan Asset-Backed Securities (SLABS), basically the same as '08's famous Mortgage Backed Securities but backed by student loans instead of mortgages. Whatever they would do in regards to student loans would be much more malicious against those who owe them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, the only thing banks learned from the ‘08 bubble was that they shouldn’t back securities with debts that can be disbursed via bankruptcy. Since student loans can’t be disbursed, they’re the gold standard for securities, and are a big reason why so many rich people are against student loan forgiveness.

[–] SinningStromgald 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'd make the universities pay the student loans.

[–] finitebanjo 3 points 1 day ago

That would indeed destroy them in the process.

They sell the education, the loan is their payment. If the loan was rescinded out of the schools pockets it would instantly go bankrupt for offering services for negative income.