this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
621 points (92.4% liked)

Canada

8161 readers
3817 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think even the countries that abstained are on their side.

They're obviously being pressured to be on that side but all of the UNSC veto holders do that. The veto power shouldn't exist because this is what happens. Veto holders are allowed to bully whoever they want with no meaningful consequences.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

even the countries that abstained are on their side.

What do you mean by on their side? Are you saying they don't believe human rights violations happened, are you saying they are just politically aligned with China, or that worried about political backlash from China?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

They're not willing to stand up to an obvious bully and push for further investigation. Closer to your second and third statements than the first. With the third being the most likely.

I do understand how my first comment could be misunderstood now though.