this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
356 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

63695 readers
3046 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5292633

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/science by /u/calliope_kekule on 2025-03-01 05:53:17+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmoNova -5 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Oh so I don‘t have to worry about China‘s increasing emissions output because they use unhinged mass surveillance and terror against the people to put a band-aid on it. Cool…

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Doesn't China emit like half the amount of carbon per capita compared to the US?

[–] mineralfellow 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China has a very large capita.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

China already "solved" it with the one child policy. They will have the most massive population decline ever in the coming decades. It will probably destroy their economy.

[–] finitebanjo 2 points 1 day ago

It's not that there should be a solution per se, more that it impacts their emissions per capita. When person density goes up average per person emissions go down, simple as.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)