this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
1017 points (98.3% liked)

The Onion

5235 readers
1090 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] coyootje 117 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, I'm not an expert by any means but haven't the republicans been able to very efficiently stifle democrat majorities before? If they just follow that playbook (delaying things, being pains in the ass, constant insistence on funky rules) they can at least annoy the shit out of them and hopefully slow things down. They're way too polite for that tho, they'd rather just let it happen and hope they come out okay in the end then to risk the wrath of the annoying orange and his minions.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

One thing they could do is stop voting with republicans to confirm Trump's appointees. Have you seen. how well the Republicans obstruct? They can get everybody in their rank and file out on network TV to call for banning a book by title while the democrats can't even get their best faces on TV to call what's happening with NY's mayor blatant quid pro quo corruption

EDIT: Trump energy chief says there are upsides to ecological collapse

[–] stopdropandprole 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

agreed. that's literally their job. oppose the other party by whatever means at their disposal. use the press, support union actions, so many ideas. be bold be creative.

they at least should stop pretending that "playing by the rules" and "trusting the system" is an appropriate response to illegal orders, illegal firings, violations of constitutional doctrine, and open defiance of judicial and legislative oversight. relevant video from InnuendoStudio, sadly aged like wine

[–] finitebanjo -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can't filibuster cabinet picks or federal judges, meaning the Dems cannot stop Trump appointees, either. The Republicans have 53 senate seats so they can pass whoever they want.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The GOP needs every single person on their side to pass the nominations... Which rarely happen.

Why aren't the dems working whatever GOPers they can to say no? Or is that something only the GOP is allowed to do? Get Dems to defect?

[–] finitebanjo 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

False, Hegseth is the closest to losing confirmation when 3 GOP voted no, but VP tiebreaker confirmed him anyways.

Hegseth, Vought, Gabbard, Kennedy, and Lutnick all recieved 0 dem votes and passed.

Only 3 Republicans have voted against any confirmation, and Mitch McConnell is the only republican to vote against more than one: he voted against 3.

[–] bitjunkie 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck Mitch McConnell trying to leave a legacy when he was instrumental in creating this fucking mess

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 1 day ago

Same with Pence, yeah.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yep, all they have to do is think…”what would republicans do in this situation?”

[–] Blue_Morpho 12 points 1 day ago

Republicans would get one of their followers to bash Mike Johnson's spouse in the head with a hammer like they did to Pelosi.

[–] finitebanjo 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Democrats need to pass progressive reform to win. Republicans need to stop progressive reform to win. They're playing different games.

For example, Republicans are gutting Medicaid and Medicare in their new budget proposal and the only thing Dems can do is block the bill which will defund those programs regardless.

Zero win conditions.