politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Yes because Trump was the one that released the bird flu that wiped out the American chicken population right before he took office...
Like there are so many valid reasons to call out Trump, but this one is stupid. Sometimes I swear y'all just like taking the bait.
Trump in a grocery store in August 2024:
He owns it. Whether he actually had any power to affect this is not our problem.
Trump says a ton of shit he either never has any intent to follow through on or just to get under the skin of some people.
Anyone with half a brain knew he wasnt the cause or going to immediately fix the problem that started before he took office.
But the far right maga ballsacks garglers will eat it up and believe everything he says. But also so does the left apparently. It's literally a free win for Him every single time he says shit like this. His base gets happy. His haters get distracted. He gets to do other shit while y'all argue under every post about it.
Meanwhile anyone with a fuckin brain knew he didn't cause the egg shortage and he certainly wasn't going to be able to fix it right away.
Stop falling for his bait. Y'all do it so goddamn often. You guys even talk about how you get stuck in a smoke screen. Or how they "flood the zone" and yet here you all are falling into that same goddamn trap again.
This isn't people falling for Trump's bait. This is people hitting back at Trump's popularity, which he does care about. They're pinning this failure to him. Sticking to one point which particularly impacted voters is a good strategy.
You're making the same classic mistake that most people make. It's not what attention you give them. It's any attention you give them.
Calling him out and agreeing with him may as well be the same thing to him. Either way he's on your mind.
If I could snap my fingers and tomorrow every single person alive ignored him entirely he would probably spiral within a few days.
He craves attention regardless of what kind it is. Y'all keep giving it to him.
I feel like the egg/grocery thing is more targeting the people that voted for him with grocery prices as the reason which is IMO a dumb reason to vote for anyone particularly with all the bigger problems right now