this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
800 points (99.5% liked)

memes

11979 readers
2577 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well when they're saying there's 2% odds, that's....probably still higher than you want for the probability of a world ending asteroid strike.

[–] mipadaitu 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's not a world ending strike. It's 2.3% odds that a city ending strike lands somewhere on earth, most likely in the ocean.

It's a fraction of a fraction of a % that it'll hit somewhere with any humans at all, much less a populated city.

And on top of that, we have until 2032 to decide what to do about it, with enough time to potentially redirect it with technology we've already demonstrated that works. And if that isn't enough, we just need one or two more data points to figure out almost exactly where it will hit, and can evacuate the area.

Just like we do for hurricanes and other natural disasters.

This is not an emergency, this is an easy mode try out for a real disaster.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is not an emergency, this is an easy mode try out for a real disaster.

So it's going to be horribly fumbled in the stupidest manner possible and will definitely become a worldwide disaster. Got it.

[–] harmsy 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

45/47 is going to shoot down anything that tries to divert it, then. Gotcha.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

It's not even gonna hit until 2032, orange fuckface is dead by then

[–] BowtiesAreCool 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The one caveat is, it’s going to be out of visual range soon and we won’t get any more info for a few years

[–] mipadaitu 2 points 1 week ago

The caveat to THAT is that we do have historical data, and if we can find one or more images confirmed to be the target, we could narrow it down without additional imaging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The only thing to ever have a higher score than this one on the Torino scale (before further calculations reclassified it as a 0) is scheduled to come close by in 2029. Should be interesting to watch, at least.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

You're clearly falling for the clickbait articles if you read that this is a world ender.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

There's a great video by Scott Manly on the subject if you want to learn more. It'd smaller than some nukes we've tested, and would land somewhere around the equator between the Atlantic and China if it does hit. It looks surprisingly feasible to deflect, but it'd be a time crunch to put a mission together in only a couple of months. Plus it might deflect it into hitting a different country.

https://youtu.be/kK5IXX4p2d0

[–] edgemaster72 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not high enough odds