this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
68 points (91.5% liked)

Canada

7971 readers
1395 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where I live, that seems like a truly terrible idea.

Cyclists move really quickly and are somewhat reckless and selfish as they try to maintain their speed and momentum in traffic. It barely works with cars despite the dedicated lanes. It always causes problems anywhere that bike and pedestrian traffic meets, especially in areas n like temporarily diversion or construction.

I support bike lanes and, for quite a while, I use them extensively biking from the suburbs to my work downtown. I was probably the same.

We should not place slow-moving ( and vulnerable ) traffic in the path of cyclists. We do not need grandma or a paraplegic getting wiped out by a 180 pound guy going 25 km an hour.

You could try to make the bike lane massively wider. This would be a poor use of space. It would greatly increase congestion and the “slow alternative vehicle lane” would be almost empty all the time. It would be 30 empty wheelchair parking spots at the mall while cars get in accidents trying to find a spot but worse.

Of course, out of the city, things are different. My family enjoys a nice bike ride every Sunday on a local road that has quite a wide lane running side it that pedestrians, wheelchairs, scooters, and cyclists share. The lane is wide enough and traffic density is low enough. There are no buildings to move so, the “road” got wider with the extra lane rather than space for cars being reduced.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago

I fully agree. Also if your bike lanes are like the ones in my city, these people (wheelchair and mobility scooter users) would find themselves suddenly in traffic. Right where they are in serious danger from cars.