this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
324 points (98.8% liked)

politics

20340 readers
3598 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
324
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

Summary

The term "DEI" (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) has become a coded way for Republicans to conceal their anti-Black racism, echoing past racist dog whistles.

This parallels with Lee Atwater’s 1981 admission that conservatives used abstract terms like “states’ rights” to mask racism.

Today, figures like Alina Habba, Tim Burchett, and far-right influencers use "DEI hire" to discredit qualified Black figures.

The media's failure to challenge this rhetoric allows racism to persist, making "DEI" a modern substitute for explicit racial slurs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MothmanDelorian -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yet god forbid you recognize that fascism cones in different flavors than Nazism. Mussolini was not a nazi nor was Peron yet both were fascists

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're going to put words in my mouth, please serve them with fries and a side salad.

[–] MothmanDelorian -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My point is how leftists will spend a lot of time differentiating between the various types of leftism but seemingly don’t get that all fascists are not Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think I understand your point now.

I saw a lot of people going off on how Genocide Joe was as bad as Hitler, and they could never vote for him.

Haven't heard too much from them lately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Haven’t heard too much from them lately.

The bot farm has moved on.

[–] MothmanDelorian 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s more how if you point out Trump’s actions are more in line with Orban and Mussolini rather than the Nazis you get called a Nazi sympathizer rather than just being better informed on fascist philosophy/beliefs/delusions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wouldn't bother; it's a distinction without a difference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Exactly. The necessary actions are the same regardless of which flavor of fascism Trump is serving up.

If I say "There's a raving maniac pointing a Glock at my head," the last thing I want to hear is "Well, acksualllly, that one was manufactured under license in Serbia..."

[–] MothmanDelorian 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s a significant difference as most fascists do not engage in attempts to eliminate parts of humanity in order to facilitate the creation of a master race. Not all fascists are that level of crazy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of an old joke.

They ask Brezhnev about Stalin. Leonid says that Stalin was completely insane and that he'd let 50 million people die before he changed one of his policies.

"If five million people died because of me, that would make me reconsider."

[–] MegaUltraChicken 2 points 1 week ago

You're absolutely correct, but I prefer "Nazi" solely because that word specifically has it's own level of disgust to me, and I want to convey that level of disgust for republicans. No other shorthand carries the proper emotional connotation for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's there to talk about? Leftists kept trying to tell you that the Democrats were going to lose the election if they didn't start listening to their base. The Democrats didn't listen to their base, and got walloped everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And if you're a Leftist and didn't go all in helping the Dems, you've got exactly nothing to be proud of.

I donated to Bernie in 2016 and 2020 and 2024 and every time the Left managed not to organize and get him nominated.