this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
320 points (98.8% liked)

Space

9233 readers
598 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic 23 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Can it direct the asteroid to mar a Lago?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

I don't believe it is a possible target given how the orbital disk of the asteroid intersects with the surface of the earth. That's of we don't change the orbit, if we decide that is necessary, we'll probably try to get a complete miss instead of just changing the impact site.

DON'T LOOK UP

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

DC, please. Move all the good museums and historical stuff first, but don't tell the administration.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

Or at the people forcing politics into every-single-discussion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

politics has an ugly way of forcing itself into your life, if you don't already think about it.

[–] andros_rex 2 points 2 hours ago

Well, this administration has been forcing politics into NASA by cutting funding and making all female/POC/LGBT employees unsafe/invisible. It’d be lovely if NASA was free from politics, but as we saw from Trumps last appointment of the totally unqualified Bridenstone, politics is shoving its ugly dick into science.

[–] CheeseNoodle 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately in a worst case scenario this gets very political, if we do something about it in advance an impactor probe should do the job, if we decide to play the 1/50 odds and lose then the most effective short notice method is a nuke. Not a direct strike but a near detonation which vaporizes a section of the surface of the object with the outgoing plasma effectively functioning as a massive thruster. Actually doing this is not trivial but not hard either (from an engineering standpoint), the tricky part would be actually managing to launch it without every nation on earth that happens to have a beligerant leader saber rattling and stone walling the prospect of a launch until its too late even for a nuke to do any good.

[–] kreskin 4 points 6 hours ago

I hope we didnt cut all of NASAs funding yet. I'd hate to leave that worst case scenario to Musk or Boeing to handle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Ikr, I have a bunch of terms on my filter list but then its in the comments anyway

[–] [email protected] -3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I have separate filter lists for both, posts and comments but I need to keep adding new ones every day. I guess "Mar a lago" is the one I'm adding today.

[–] db2 4 points 12 hours ago

I'm talking about it right now in this reply but not giving you any keywords. Muhaha.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

the correct name is Mar-a-Lago, make sure to include that one, too!

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic 0 points 15 hours ago

Ok, whatever dude.