Curated Tumblr

I'm not making a value judgment here, I'm merely talking about how economics works.

The whole purpose of a corporation is to generate profit, and to do that it needs to convince customers to buy from them. If there's sufficient competition, corporations may appear to be acting "good," but that's only because the profitable option benefits customers.

Yes, profit and inflation are linked, but it's important to understand both what allowed increased profits (in this case supply disruption) and the consequences. From your article:

A spike in profit margins contributed significantly to inflation in the early part of the pandemic recovery, and likely contributed to even more persistent inflationary pressure by helping spur a countervailing rise in nominal wage growth.

It's not just profits, but real wage growth. If you'll remember, there was a labor shortage during and just after the pandemic, which led to workers demanding increased pay. Fast food jobs, for example, typically paid $8-9/hr in my area, with "better" chains (the ones for whom better customer service was their competitive advantage) offering $12/hr. During and just after the pandemic, $12 was the normal fast food wage, and the "better" chains jumped to $15+. My state still uses the federal minimum wage ($7.25/hr), so it's not legislative action, but shifts in wage expectations that resulted in wages going up, which justifies the higher prices for fast food (fast food is incredibly price competitive).

Continuing on with your source:

instead of suppressing wages, they raised prices. If this episode increases public support for measures that constrain excess corporate power, that would be good even if it has little relevance for inflation in the future.

Both prices and wages are sticky, especially in less competitive industries. But prices do come down relative to inflation over time, provided the market is competitive enough. Look at car prices, they were sticky until well after supply returned to normal because demand for cars remained high, but now car prices are largely back to normal, relative to inflation, because it turns out higher volume is usually better than higher margins.

The same pattern will happen to eggs, but even faster because the cycle time to bring getting a new batch of egg laying hens is comparatively short (5-6 months from hatching to producing eggs), and the customer purchase cycle is rapid.

To understand what's going on, we need to understand why corporations could get away with increasing prices:

1. Supply was constrained due to global supply chain factors; if your competitors all sell out, people will come to you and your higher prices (also why scalping works)
2. People had extra cash (stimulus, less activities outside)
3. Production costs increased due to shortages (lots of great excuses)

Yes, they cranked up profits when they saw an opportunity. I don't see that as "bad," I see it as expected. Corporations exist to generate profits, so if life gives you lemons (supply chain disruption), you make lemonade (increase margins on the supply you have).

What I do see as "bad" is corporations getting away with violating the law with essentially a slap on the wrist. There are two main ways to fix bad corporate behavior:

• stiff competition
• lawsuits

And when the first fails, the second just isn't sufficient to actually change behavior, since fines are merely a cost of doing business. Raising prices itself isn't illegal, colluding with competitors absolutely is, and the penalties need to more than account for the profit from colluding.