this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)
Denver Post Comment Section
323 readers
59 users here now
A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The Republican party did that back in the 1960s after the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts. You're doing a both sides thing and it doesn't work well.
Sure champ. Show me where Harris advocated against the power of the wealthy to the benefit of the working class at all in her campaign. The silence there was deafening.
There are legitimate instances where "both sides" is blatant hypocrisy, but this isn't one of them. Democrats lost because they refused to address the inequalities and power the rich have. Just the other day the new head of the DNC was talking about how they will only take money from "good billionaires" showing they haven't learned a thing. When the wealthy can buy your party and control the direction it goes, seemingly always to the right, that's a fucking problem.
When it comes to the wealthy the right and left hands of this nation are more than happy jerking each other off for their personal gain at the cost to the rest of us. Corporate Democrats are Republicans for all intents and purposes in this case.
I stopped reading at this point. You made it personal for no reason and don't deserve a response.
This might be the funniest thing I've read all day. Thanks for that.