politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Maybe we should have went after the anti-genovide vote instead making sure the only two options in such an important race were pro-genocide?
Like, you know that was always an option right?
And so is not making trumpian level comments taunting people about an ongoing genocide?
Jill Stein was the third party, right? At least the biggest. The one who went for dinner with putin?
Why does that make it ok to have been forced into a dem candidate who was:
Pro-fracking
Pro-border wall
Pro-genocide
Pro-corporations
Without a primary?
Every vote Jill Stein got was due to a failure of the DNC and Biden/Kamala.
And they cost us a lot more that just didn't vote.
Sure. Dont vote. Dont try anything at all! let the status quo continue. Or maybe, slide even further to the right
No one is advocating for people not voting...
I'm saying the DNC needs to start letting voters decide who makes it to the general via a fair primary to maximize our chances of stopping fascism.
Do you understand the difference?
Absolutely, I understand the difference and I agree.
Reality unfortunately didnt pan out that way.
Are you implying overall trump is the best result, given the options of harris, trump, stein?
But if you understand...
Why are you making trumpian jokes about an ongoing genocide?
Why aren't you blaming the people who are actually the problem?
… what? Do you think its going to improve under trump?
But why are you punching down on people whose family was already victims of a genocide and continued to be in that?
Like, it would be just as bad as under Kamala, as I quoted in my very first reply:
Biden had already cut off funding and refused to reinstate it after it was discovered the reason they were cut off was fabricated by Israel....
Regardless of who won, they were fucked.
So what exactly was your comment about if not punching down at all those people?
Its a sarcastic comment on trump. you are reading a lot into it.
and youre ignoring half of my comments
I can't possibly see how...
How is trump saying he'll continue a Biden policy decision a sarcastic comment on him when Kamla couldn't shut up about how she also wouldn't deviate from Bidens's policy positions on the genocide?
Like, it's literally true in this case, trump Biden, and Kamala would have all been the same on this issue.
okay dokey friend. good luck with this administration
So you can't explain how your comment is what you claim using logic?
Because I can't see a scrap in what your claiming
Edit:
I mean. When confronted with questions like this, most trumpets also use a vague claim of "sarcasm" or "just a joke bro" and then are completely incapable of explaining how that could be true...
So I guess I shouldn't expect any more from some "joking" about an ongoing genocide like it's not a serious topic.
Where are you getting a “logical comment” from my obvious sarcasm?
harris would have been better for palestine than trump.
Its been what, a week? Im not american - yall got four years to go. So, good luck!