Life Pro Tips

2626 readers

1 users here now

Unlocking the Secrets to Success and Fulfillment!

Rules

Share valuable life pro tips.
Keep it concise and clear.
Stay on-topic.
Respect fellow members.
No self-promotion.
Verify information before sharing.
Avoid illegal or unethical advice.
Report rule violations.

Join us and share your best life pro tips!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

sabbah

HonoraryMancunian

223

LPT: Worried about martial law being declared in response to mass peaceful protest? Then you already have no rights guaranteed to you so you lose nothing by applying other means to stop injustice (self.lifeprotips)

submitted 5 days ago by Squorlple to c/lifeprotips

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This LPT doesn’t violate the community rule against illegal advice because in this purely hypothetical scenario the law means nothing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] givesomefucks -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As noted elsewhere in the thread,

That was you're own rambling unsourced interpretation...

And now you're acting like it's a source?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

6 3 split in the court is an established fact, so I'm not sure what you're trying to argue. Their other statements were also accurate as far as I can tell.

Edit: Downvote all you like but you'll still be wrong lol

[–] alekwithak 4 points 4 days ago

You are correct, I was referring to the Dems having a majority across all three branches, the judicial branches being one of the big three I'm not sure how it could possibly be irrelevant 🙄

[–] givesomefucks -2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Because no one was talking about SC....

And if we are, then Biden should have expanded it after McTurtle stole Obama's last seat.

Like, you have to draw the line somewhere, don't claim that we also have to factor in the Reno County dog catcher now.

Moderates don't have it in them to fight fascism.

[–] alekwithak 3 points 4 days ago

You are incorrect, I was referring to the Dems having a majority across all three branches of government. The judicial branches being one of the big three I'm not sure how it could possibly be irrelevant 🙄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

SCOTUS is irrelevant? Really???

Let's go ahead and ignore that absurd take.

How would he have the means to achieve that?

Edit: No explanation given, just drama and flouncing. Duly noted.

[–] givesomefucks -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Let’s go ahead and ignore that absurd take.

Why would anyone want to interact with someone acting like this?

It's a rhetorical question by the way, I'll never see your response or any other comments you ever make.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

k, bye!