this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
469 points (99.2% liked)

The Onion

4968 readers
1743 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Canadian government has insisted that information on domestic goods is readily available to all trading partners, even including nations that recently elected a felony-convicted game show host to be their head of state. Instead, the United States has decided to employ a rarely-chosen trade tactic that international economists refer to as the “fuck around and find out” model.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 20 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

No, saying you chose this is wrong but saying that Americans chose this is correct because he was democratically elected.

[–] ZoopZeZoop 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

No, if the election was fair, he would have lost. In fact, he would probably be in jail by now. The Republicans have been disenfranchising people for decades including by passing laws and limiting access to voting, there's heavy gerrymandering, disinformation campaigns, etc., etc.

The results of the election are not based on a fair election. Some people actively voted for this, either because they're bad people or willfully ignorant, but many people couldn't vote. For many people who did vote, their vote didn't count the way it should (gerrymandering). Education funds and topics have been cut for decades. People aren't taught how to think critically, and check to see if news they read is factual. Some of this has been going on for decades and we're seeing the compounded results of those tactics.

So, no, America did not vote for this. We were shoehorned into it and now blamed for it. Fuck that noise. We're all at the mercy of these assholes and need to fight back.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He won based on the current rules.

[–] ZoopZeZoop 1 points 34 minutes ago

Does that make it all of America's fault? If they make the rules and then win ONLY because of the rules, that doesn't make it everyone's fault. It makes it the fault of the people who made the rules. Don't be obtuse. They want everyone to blame everyone else instead of blaming them. We have to come together or this shit will destroy civilization.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

The fact Americans have gerrymandering is insane. But I want to point out that Tronald Dump won popular vote, too

[–] ZoopZeZoop 1 points 16 minutes ago (1 children)

Some polling places were closed, forcing those people to vote elsewhere. Not everyone can wait in long lines for hours. There were disinformation campaigns about vote by mail and many people were worried those votes wouldn't be counted because of it. I don't know if I heard confirmation it occurred on election day, but I read news stories about voter intimidation because of groups of armed men. They employed tons of tactics to suppress voting.

If you suppress everyone who disagrees with you from voting, of course you're going to win the popular vote.

Did he technically win the popular vote and the general election, yes, it appears he did, but 51% or more of people who could have voted did not support this shit. Not to mention he lied. He lied. Yes, he said he'd do some of this, but he also said he'd bring down the price of groceries, make better health care, and make America great again (firing thousands of government employees who did nothing wrong is not making anything great). He has no intention of bringing down grocery prices or fixing health care. He's getting rid of competent people and replacing them with loyalists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 58 seconds ago

Don’t see riots though. Especially one would assume it’s time to riot now when it’s unambiguously clear he was lying. Yeah, there are few protests about specific laws/orders but not against president. Americans seem to be fine having shameless lair in charge so far

[–] Rhoeri 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I suppose that’s a fair point. It comes down to perception I guess. Maybe it’s best described as “some” Americans chose this.

The headline is just vaguely misleading enough to fuel the anti-American ideology even further. Because as we’ve seen right here on lemmy, there are people stupid enough to believe that the entire country supports everything that criminal does.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

The scores of “don’t blame me / don’t blame all of us” comments ring hollow.

If Americans want to convince Canadians that they don’t want what the person elected to represent them wants then I expect to see “support Canada” rallies in every democrat-leaning city across the country.

Even if it did absolutely nothing to solve the problem it would at least fill me with a hope that a few people actually give a damn.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It’s the exact same thing as saying Americans voted in Obama, it’s not meant to be a statement that’s correct for every individual.

[–] Rhoeri -2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I know, I’d probably take issue with that as well. I just hate blanket statements.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You hate all blanket statements?

[–] Rhoeri 2 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago) (1 children)

As I said earlier, I believe blanket systems should be called out when they’re wrong. Maybe you missed that part.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 1 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

But isn’t the problem is that all blanket statements are wrong?

I mean there will always be an exception.

[–] Rhoeri 1 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

I get that you love arguing. You’re pretty notorious for it. But unfortunately, I’m not going to fall for that shit.

It’s very clear for anyone to easily understand exactly what I am saying and with all due respect, I’m not going to get caught up in some derailment of the discount because you feel the need to lead me into one of your “gotcha” moments.

Blanket statements issued for the purpose of misleading people, or injecting a bias into the topic should be called out. That is what I said- that is what I meant.

I am not arguing semantics.