this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
744 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

5618 readers
3190 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NABDad 91 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

No. That wouldn't happen in a gun store.

You'd have to go to a gun show.

Edit: a gun show is like comic con, only for guns.

[–] Metz 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I mean Terminator 1 takes place in 1984. As far a quick search goes, there were no background checks, no assault weapon ban, no waiting period, ..etc

[–] BeMoreCareful 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think you could still buy machine guns. No phased plasma rifles though.

[–] shalafi 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey pal, only what you see here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

What, not even one in the 40-watt range?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's really difficult to buy them even now.

[–] setsneedtofeed 3 points 1 month ago

The process is quite simple. It's just the prices...

[–] BeMoreCareful 2 points 1 month ago

I mean you can still buy them with a tax stamp if they're made before '86, but you're going to pay a lot and it'll take some time to transfer. I think at the time that you could just walk into a gun store and buy a new Uzi.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Background checks started in '68, they didn't become instant until like '93 because internet but they still existed, I think it was by phone back then. The rest of that isn't around now either except for some states, the national AWB expired 21yr ago, and there's never been national waiting periods.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Background checks started in '68, they didn't become instant until like '93 because internet but they still existed

They may have existed and some states imposed them but they weren't required federally until the Brady bill in '93 .

there's never been national waiting periods.

There was a 5 day waiting period required nationally between when the Brady bill was first enacted in '93 and when the national instant criminal background check system came online in '98

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Huh no shit TIL about that waiting period, thanks! I can't look it up until later (at work, can fire off a message but not do research y'know) but would you happen to know how long it lasted?

Though the questionnaires in the 60s were largely ineffective and took time, unless I am mistaken they were stored by the FBI until the ATF started existing in the early 70s, but yes "NICs" wasn't until "I" was possible as I mentioned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How long it lasted?

Between '94 and '98, after they mandated the background checks but before they had the infrastructure to do instant background checks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] setsneedtofeed 5 points 1 month ago

The NFA existed.

[–] SupraMario 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Private sales are private sales. Has nothing to do with gun shows, that shit is just ignorance from anti-2a groups/people. The pro2a people have been asking for access to the NICS for years. Even if we had to pay $10 for a BG check to come back as clear or not, but they don't want that because it takes away from their wedge issue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but they don’t want that because it takes away from their wedge issue.

Who is "they" in this case?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Republicans and Democrats. They both require wedge issues to keep us divided and easily steered.

[–] SupraMario 3 points 1 month ago

Yep. Republicans don't give a fuck about gun rights, they just use it as a wedge issue. The same for the dems on abortion, they could have solidified roe into law a good number of times now, but they didn't because it's a wedge issue that got votes. Even RBG said the roe was a weak verdict to be holding up abortion rights.

[–] jaxxed 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

even as a foreigner, it is clear to me that gun-wary Americans tend not to be anti-2a, but want background checks and gun limits. Maybe politicians fit your narrative, especially Democrats, but if you are talking about citizens you are likely straw-manning.

[–] setsneedtofeed 7 points 1 month ago

The point is that private sellers have been asking to access NICS (the background check system) but politicians, who are in charge of giving that access through laws, have not allowed it. It is not "strawmanning" to be talking about the people with the actual ability to provide the access.

[–] IMongoose 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's required in Illinois to use a private seller portal for private sales through the state police site. It does some kind of check and it's free to use.

[–] SupraMario 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's awesome, does it do the national database? That's one of the downfalls I've read about. Local BGCs end up being just local, so someone can just hop the state line and then it's pointless. Every gun owner I've ever talked to has wanted access to the NICS, we want to know who we're selling to. Most of the people I talk with won't sell unless the person buying has a CCW.

[–] IMongoose 1 points 1 month ago

I'm not exactly sure if it does NICS specifically. The portal really just checks to see if they have a valid FOID (firearm owner ID, an Illinois special) card, but the foid card is linked to other data bases. I'm not super familiar with all the specifics. Relevant links:

https://verify.ispfsb.com/Public/Verification.aspx

https://isp.illinois.gov/Media/CompletePressRelease/679

[–] Eheran 5 points 1 month ago

What would not be like that? Nidal Hasan did it pretty much like that prior to his 2009 Fort Hood shooting?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except Comic Con is rare, and they don't have to take down their "gun show this weekend!" signs here in Iowa because that's every weekend, or so it seems.

Agreed though. I was actually worried about what maga might do if Harris won, so I made my first purchases before the election. I had to provide ID, enter some personal identifiers into a website and be approved by a federal agency. It took an extra 30 minutes or so.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I live next to fairgrounds. Every Saturday: Gun and Knife Show.

But I also remember working at a marina and where I saw far more transactions take place between two parked vehicles than anything that requires paperwork.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

a gun show is like comic con, only for guns.

So people dress up as sexy guns?

[–] NABDad 2 points 1 month ago

They cosplay as tough guys.