this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
618 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18074 readers
2987 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
618
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

The White House and Democratic members of Congress called Georgia Republican’s comparison a ‘compliment’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

people are tired of choosing between 2-3 old people

You're NEVER going to get a good option. You vote for the least-worse. Always -- lather, rinse, repeat.

I'm not sure how this is confusing. Show up at the polling station, with some idea of each loser's plan, and pick the one who can pull off the most of a decent plan -- or, said a different way, whoever will suck the least.

[–] DragonAce 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

You’re NEVER going to get a good option. You vote for the least-worse. Always – lather, rinse, repeat.

That is the entire problem and telling people "Thats just the way it is, deal with it" is not going to solve it. Our "democratic" system is completely broken, we are given the illusion of choice when in reality all candidates are preselected and paraded in front of the public as if they have our best interests at heart, when in reality they all have the same mandate from their corporate overlords. The US is a corporatocracy masquerading as a democracy, we as ordinary citizens have no real say in the matter. That needs to change, full stop!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That needs to change, full stop!

America's system of voting "first past the post" ensures that one of the top two candidates will win. It pretty much guarantees a two-party system will win.

So, the strategy would be:

    1. Try to get an alternative voting system like "Ranked Choice Voting" in place. This has been done successfully in Maine and Alaska, I think. We need more of it. [Yes, I know Ranked Choice is not perfect, but it's definitely better than we have.]
    1. Until then, your best vote (mathematically) is to vote for one of the top two candidates that is closest to what you want. Yes, you'll have to hold your nose a few times to vote for the "least worst" of the two, but honestly, it's better than the alternative, of having the "worst worst" of the two.

Hope this helps.

[–] SCB 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You don't even have to oppose the two party system to support ranked choice. I like ranked choice, especially for state reps/senators, and I'm very pro two-party system.

I know it opens the door to other parties I don't necessarily want to exist, but it's just a good idea full stop.

[–] SCB 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's not a broken system when the most popular person wins. No one was preselected.

A majority of people think Biden is in their best interest.

[–] MossBear 0 points 11 months ago

If you want things to change, you have to accept that it's rarely going to be a sudden, profound moment. It's small steps adding up over time. If people aren't willing to take the small steps, just because they're not big steps, then we'll all soon find ourselves pulled backwards through our own apathy.

[–] SCB 1 points 11 months ago

Biden was literally my favorite in the primaries. I got my first pick as President.

Frankly I think if people wanted some wacky, off the wall, Williamson-style candidate, they're too dumb to try to reason with so their votes really just should be assumed not to happen