this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
354 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19350 readers
2919 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Fox News’s attempt to find support for Donald Trump in Greenland backfired, as most residents expressed disinterest in his proposals.

While one Trump supporter was found, the majority of Greenlanders interviewed criticized Trump’s comments and expressed a preference for remaining under Danish rule.

Despite these setbacks, Trump continues to advocate for acquiring Greenland, citing economic security concerns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For the economic security of the world, the US should grant a 99 year lease to the Chinese, Hong Kong style to maintain a free port.

See how stupid it sounds? Fix yourself please, US.

[–] MothmanDelorian 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Greenland houses an important NATO base that would be needed in a fight against Russia. This os why Trump wants Greenland

[–] btaf45 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Greenland houses an important NATO base

Then just claim the base. No need to take over the handful of towns.

that would be needed in a fight against Russia. This os why Trump wants Greenland

Trump is on the same side as Putin. Trump "wants Greenland" for no other reason than to get attention. He's a narcissist. Everything he does can be explain by Trump's hunger for your attention. He's not actually worth people's attention.

[–] MothmanDelorian 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

America cannot claim a NATO base. Do you need that explained to you?

[–] btaf45 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They can claim any part of Greenland. Although they would likely be violating international law. But be aware that Traitorapist Trump has already gotten away with committing many domestic crimes.

[–] MothmanDelorian 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Acts of war are different than the crimes he has been accused of.

[–] btaf45 -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Since 99% of Greenland is uninhabited, he could just claim those parts and let the few towns choose whether they wanted to join or not. It actually is a little weird that just 50,000 people can "own" a gigantic 99% uninhabited island the size of Greenland.

But I think the claim is that he wants to purchase Greenland from Denmark. There is actually a historical precedent for exactly that. The USA purchased the Virgin Islands from Denmark in 1917. We also purchased ~~Puerto Rico from Spain~~, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma etc from France, and Alaska from Russia.

[–] MothmanDelorian 3 points 2 days ago

Trump can't claimland that is already owned by another nation.

Most of Alaska is empty and uninhabited does that mean China, Mongolia or Canada could claim it?

Regardless he's doing this to benefit Russia amd not the USA as Trump does not work for the American people.

[–] MothmanDelorian 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We did not purchase Puerto Rico. We took that in war.

[–] btaf45 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're right. There was no payment for Puerto Rico. The payment to Spain was for the Phillipines

[–] MothmanDelorian 2 points 2 days ago

And Denmark and Greenland have no interest in the sake which is why pursuing this any further is an act of war by the USA on a NATO country.

[–] btaf45 1 points 2 days ago

We know how stupid Traitorapist Trump sounds. We know he is a notorious liar and we know the rest of the world knows that Trump is a notorious liar.