Casual Conversation

1910 readers

670 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
Keep the conversation nice and light hearted
Encourage conversation in your post
Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

orangeNgreen

[email protected]

-6

Los Angeles burns, could it be the best thing to happen to LA? (self.casualconversation)

submitted 5 days ago by j4k3 to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The plague of NIMBY's may yield if a real plan is put in place to rebuild better. Vast areas could be rezoned for density. A way of addressing the enormous number of displaced people could also address the largest homeless population in the USA. The city that defines urban sprawl could be redefined. How does this play out?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Except for this slight problem of things getting WORSE and MORE FREQUENT with this cycle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you look at the Wikipedia on California wild fires you will see that no, it's not more frequent

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ignoring the word worse

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

They also list total acres burned, and no, its not worse.