this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
682 points (97.2% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

866 readers
1399 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

this cartoon implies that liberal and progressive citizens are equally responsible for the lack of attention to the owner class, when they're the only ones criticizing and trying to rein in the 1% while at the same time trying to defend against incessant attacks on pretty much every part of their identity from the bleating moron maga lemmings

[–] horse_battery_staple 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Left and Right aren't a useful representation of a person's political beliefs. I don't think this cartoon is saying left and right are the same. I think it's saying that the billionaire class is using useful idiots to help separate the working class and keep them fighting amongst ourselves.

Absolutely push back against what you see as harmful patterns and always support and defend the rights of others. If you hear someone dehumanizing immigrants or LGBTQA+ or any at risk population of course speak up.

But also challenge the logic of that person. Ask them how they believe what they believe and who benefits. You're never going to reason someone out of a position they never reasoned themselves into, but you can learn the bullshit talking points they're being fed to head off those effects for someone else.

The only way we fight Fascism in this country will be to empower each other and engender support for anti fascist action. Build mutual aid in your community and be as involved as possible politically.

mutualaidhub.org/

[–] DougHolland 5 points 1 week ago

Mutual Aid Hub is a beautiful project — absolutely an URL to be shared and saved, thank you.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they’re the only ones criticizing and trying to rein in the 1%

Progressives, maybe. But right after the Harris loss, I saw a flood of her liberal supporters deciding the LGBTQ caucus cost her the election.

[–] DougHolland 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Me too, especially the T. The manipulation is so everpresent, some of us manipulate ourselves.

[–] MutilationWave 4 points 1 week ago

We all manipulate ourselves and are manipulated constantly. It's about trying to recognize when it's happening and correct yourself. Or be open to people that are trying to help you correct yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

As a transwoman nothing frightened me more than being told that the rise of fascism was my fault for existing, even though I did everything to get the vote out for Kamela

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Liberals don't want corporate tyranny and conservatives don't want government tyranny. How do we get people to realize they're the same thing?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

liberal

trying to rein in the 1%

Choose only one. Liberals are those that subscribe to capitalism. You cannot be against the bourgeois while being for capitalism. It is contradictory.

[–] DougHolland 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You cannot ever get folks on our side using words like 'bourgeois'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Baffling statement. "Bourgeois" is one of two words that define the way my 'side' views the world. I don't think you and I are on the same side.

[–] DougHolland 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a question I've wondered for decades: Why do so many socialists speak in code-words — Bolsheviks, bourgeoisie, Engels, Marx, proletaritat, etc — which only push people away? Socialism is a grand concept; why not translate it into English?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Is this satire?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This, what you say is not as important as "How you say it"

See the idiots going "I hate Obamacare, but I love ACA!"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DougHolland 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a good start, but I'd go with 'owners' and occasionally stress, 'all owners.'

People respect plain speaking, and suspect convoluted speaking. If we want to win folks over, plain speaking is the way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Drag owns a toothbrush. Drag isn't a member of the owning class, but drag is in the most literal sense an "owner". Drag recognises you're using a technical definition of a common term, but drag doesn't think liberals will understand. They'll see your language as convoluted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Drag, good to see you again buddy

[–] DougHolland 2 points 1 week ago

I needed this & I love Drag.