this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
1235 points (98.4% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2271 readers
1008 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BradleyUffner 0 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Musk is a moron, but if you think $20 billion could end homelessness, so are you

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

He isn't a moron, he's just a narcissistic sociopath. Musk is no different than you at the yolk of a WWII bomber. He has no idea what he's doing.

But in his element, he's dangerous and does very well know what he's doing.

Musk doesn't care about the homeless. He cares about their labor and how much he and his buddies can get it for free. If being homeless and sleeping in your car is suddenly illegal nationwide, then many of us will be forced into rents we don't want to pay or end up in Musk's labor camp with the rest of their undesirables.

It was never about helping anyone.

[–] kerrigan778 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You don't think ~$31,000 spent productively per every single homeless person in the US could effectively reset the homeless crisis?

[–] BradleyUffner 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure it would help significantly. It would most likely be the most successful initiative in human history. But it won't "end homelessness".

[–] kerrigan778 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like that's pedantry on whether the definition of "end homelessness" means, 0 homeless forever vs, homelessness is a small, manageable problem again.

And if say, half of that 20 billion were put in a perpetual trust it could give a perpetual budget of 100s of millions of dollars to fund maintenance and social work staff to continue to better manage the problem.

[–] BradleyUffner 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Possibly, but the text already specifically says "in America". I feel like if you add qualifiers like that, you have already partitioned the problem as far down as you intended.

[–] kerrigan778 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I guess but then you have to stop expanding what they mean by the solution. You're not partitioning the statement of the problem any further but you're seemingly appending "forever" to the end of the solution as well as other problems that go along with homelessness. $30,000 each is enough to get every currently homeless person in the US some form of legal shelter, by definition ending homelessness in the US, however briefly.

[–] BradleyUffner 1 points 12 hours ago

Also true, but only if you can locate every single homeless person in the country. Though I'm not sure I would consider "legal shelter" a high enough bar to consider homelessness solved for that person, even for a short duration. At minimum, I think it would require them to have control of some sort of "permanent" residence, such as a month to month rental. Not simply space at a shelter.

[–] InputZero 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You're a moron if you don't think $20,000,000,000.00 wouldn't raise millions of people out of homelessness and poverty.

[–] BradleyUffner 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure it would help significantly. It would most likely be the most successful initiative in human history. But it won't "end homelessness".

[–] FLX 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BradleyUffner -2 points 12 hours ago

My wife is a tenured professor of macro social work for a major university, specializing in underserved populations. She studies these things.