this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
147 points (94.5% liked)

SpaceflightMemes

685 readers
1 users here now

A Lemmy analogue to r/SpaceXMasterRace.

Related communities for serious posts and discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, he's not wrong technically, but the context feels like it's obviously missing. We have no Saturn V vehicles anymore, nor can we build them again. Starship might require that many launches to get to TLI, but with reusability, it probably can. Not to mention that the cost will come down a bit. So it can at least do it soon.

I'm sure others have more coherent and thought out rebuttals.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

why can't we build them again? were the blueprints and knowledge lost? deliberately destroyed? genuine question

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Because a lot of "Released Engineering Documents" were just engineering notebooks, and each vehicle was different, even the parts that were supposed to be the same. There was a lot of "repair" versus "rework" disposition, and a "Just make it work; it only needs to work once" culture.

Basically, because it was a race against the Russians, and the Russians were winning.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

huh, impressive that we did a (relatively) slapdash job of it and still pulled it off. Thanks for clarifying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's downright fucking nuts that it all worked and I'm astonished we didn't leave any astronauts on the moon, and Apollo 13 crew made it back.

Apollo 13 is a helluva movie that really exposes how razor-thin everything was.

[–] Bimfred 23 points 2 weeks ago

The production lines are shut down and any custom tooling has had its materials reclaimed to make other things. The institutional knowledge, the little bits that never got written down in the blueprints or manufacturing instructions, it's all gone. The people who worked on that rocket and its components are dead or have been working on something else for the last 50 years. How well would you remember some little tidbit of information that you last needed half a lifetime ago?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] egrets 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some say our attitude should be one of gratitude, like the widows and orphans of old London Town who owe their large pensions to Wernher von Braun.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department, " says Wernher von Braun.

[–] Diplomjodler3 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because it is based on obsolete technology. You wouldn't want to build a flight computer with hard-wired (as in literal wires) software, would you? A lot of it would also have to be reverse engineered, to the point where you might as well build a new vehicle.

[–] amon 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You wouldn’t want to build a flight computer with hard-wired (as in literal wires) software

We can use an FPGA for that

[–] marcos 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The software was the thing that was in the wires, not I/O.

The wires would be replaced by FLASH memory.

[–] amon 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't they use a MROM or something instead, because flash memory can be quite volatile in the extreme conditions?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Because tech evolved, we could do better now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

because they were insanely expensive

[–] nBodyProblem 1 points 2 weeks ago

No but we have SLS, the modern equivalent

SLS is very expensive, but so was Saturn V. If all goes well we should have multiple providers that can provide SLS-like services more cheaply by on-orbit refueling, but until then we should keep SLS in production. It’s here, development is complete, and it works.