this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
410 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/VRyJb

Archived link (thank you @gAlienLifeform)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Bitch of it is that we almost drove that virus into irrelevant cycles. I think I read a couple of years ago that the UN believed we could declare victory on the disease by focusing on some suffering African areas. Who knew th at a western country of 300+ million would want to make iron lungs fashionable again? Sorry, Dr. Salk.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The country does not.

A batshit sliver of people do. One of them just happens to be appointed to the Department of Health and Human Services.

This is not a majority stance.

[–] krashmo 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If the result is the same does the distinction matter?

[–] Rapidcreek 5 points 4 days ago

Exactly. Viruses could care less if you're a lunatic or not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes. It means we're in distress and need help

[–] krashmo 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Help from who? What would that look like?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Well... The EU further increasing their regulations and punishments on US mega corps would be welcome. Official programs for medical tourism would also be nice, even in countries without universal healthcare the costs are cheaper even with a round trip flight to another continent

We also have a very impulsive and narcissistic manchild about to return to the white house. He's deeply insecure and likes to project - if figures mock and laugh at him publicly enough from the right angle, he'll respond. He's a wildcard so it'll be like hearding cats, but in the absurdist state of the country it could actually help us

Or it can be as simple as treating us like oppressed victims. The US as the land of freedom and opportunity is an image that holds us back... We're not very free and we have very few opportunities (unless you're rich). Chipping holes in that facade really gets to some people

We might be the largest military and economic power, but we're largely brainwashed by optics, and so that's a weak spot that can be exploited

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

The country had a chance to show that though. None of this is surprising.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Bold of you to assume they won't just send people with polio to extermination camps.