this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
420 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That's what they would have said about Obama in 2004 if anyone knew his name back then...

AOC could, should, and hopefully will run

[–] ilinamorato 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That would be awesome. If elected, she would be the first president younger than me. And since she's undoubtedly smarter than I am, I'm cool with it.

[–] givesomefucks 9 points 4 days ago

It's insane how fast they normalized geriatric candidates who both clearly had issues.

The only two presidents over 70 on inauguration day is trump at 70 and Biden at 78, now it's gonna be trump at 78 again.

Bill was 46, Obama was 47, even GW was 54.

This is a very recent development and everyone's already acting like anything under 85 is fine

It's fucking insane to me. Just a complete rejection of reality

[–] AugustWest -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This was practically a different country in 2004/2008 and let’s not pretend Obama and AOC are close on the political spectrum.

[–] givesomefucks 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You could almost say that after 20 years the standard of progressive changed?

Dont tell Pelosi or Biden, they still thinking the standard isn't open racism, because that's what it was in the 60s.

But yes, AOC is more progressive in 2024 than Obama in 2004.

But so is fucking society.

If you want the Dem party in 2024 to be the same it was in 2004, that's like if in 2004 you wanted 1984.

If that's what you want, go be a conservative and drag them to the middle.

Stop fighting progress because you don't want it that far. The bigger danger is going too far right. So for fucks sake be honest about your political identity and go moderate the Republican party instead of ruining the only other option.

[–] AugustWest 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are a whole lot of assumptions in this comment. I don’t want a less progressive candidate than AOC. I want a more progressive candidate, but I want one who is going to win. A woman, POC, New Yorker isn’t it, as much as I wish it was.

I also don’t agree that society is more progressive since Obama’s presidency. More tolerant of certain things, sure. But more likely to vote for progressive economic policies? I don’t think so.

As the boomers and older Gen X start to die off, things will slide left. But AOC 2028? Give me a break.

[–] givesomefucks 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

But more likely to vote for progressive economic policies? I don’t think so.

So, that's your opinion...

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/02/29/americans-top-policy-priority-for-2024-strengthening-the-economy/

That says 5 out of the top 6 policy positions are progressive economic policy...

All over 60% support.

So like, you're entitled to your opinion, but statistical analysis is still a science and I'm going with science this time.

[–] AugustWest 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What people care about is not always what they vote for, and what people say they care about is another thing entirely.

I’ll leave you with this: I want to be proved wrong and champagne is on me if I am. I just don’t believe in Americans enough to believe that we as a whole are going to effect real change.

I’m going to stop trying, though.

[–] givesomefucks 0 points 4 days ago

What people care about is not always what they vote for

We don't know because the DNC won't stay out of primaries or let a progressive into the general.

Stop acting like why trump won is a mystery, we can't afford to miss the obvious solution