this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
104 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19226 readers
2828 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The 2019 ICE raids on Mississippi poultry plants, which detained 680 workers, have left the immigrant community in Morton scarred and fearful of renewed workplace raids under Trump, who plans mass deportations.

Residents recall the trauma, with children left stranded and families torn apart. Local businesses, reliant on immigrant workers, suffered economically, while poultry plants quickly resumed operations.

Activists and nonprofits are preparing families for potential detentions, emphasizing the economic and social impacts of such raids.

Many undocumented workers fear another round of disruptions and family separations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alteon 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, he said they voted for a racist, because they're idiotic misogynists.

I don't think most of them even realize what they voted for.

[–] AngryCommieKender -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've heard a lot of people blame misogyny for this election, but I'm really not sure how much that came into play, it may have for a small percentage, but that doesn't explain all the voters that just sat out. Kamala did what every losing Democrat has done, namely shunned the left and courted the right. I'm pretty sure that if Prez Rickard had run with her campaign strategy, especially courting a fucking Cheney, he would lose. And Prez NEVER loses an election, he's a literal comic book golden boy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prez_(character)

[–] Alteon 4 points 1 week ago

Her policies were all pretty progressive though: childcare support, taxing the rich, supporting the middle class....short of pushing UBI or free higher education, I really don't know how much more she could have done without alienating center-democrats.

I mean. Sure....I get that she leaned into the center, but from her perspective (and likely at the advice of her staff) she believed that she already HAD the left and that her goal was to try and speak to centrists to come over to the Democrats side of the aisle "look, we have soo many people from the right even supporting us." I honestly don't know how she could have played it differently - it feels like it's a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" sort of ordeal. Like, imagine that she pushed a solid progressive campaign and lost....I feel like everyone would have jumped down her throat about not branching out "why did you speak only to the solid, reliable liberals planning to vote you instead of going out to get the votes of others?". I don't know. That's my two cents. If I'm off base, just let me know I've been hoping for someone to break it down for me.