this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
123 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19164 readers
3790 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reports of Oath Keepers in the Department of Homeland Security and Border Patrol officers collaborating with militias continue to concern Congress.

Archived Link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChocoboRocket 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are the standards so so so unbelievably low for positions of authority?

I'd be surprised if there any agencies left that aren't already half in the pocket of domestic terrorists.

[–] stanleytweedle 9 points 1 year ago

Sadly the talent pool for public service sucks in general, because the jobs tend to suck by nature and we don't go out of our way to promote public service or recruit anything above the bottom of the barrel.

Multiply that times a half-century of copaghanda and the drug war pre-selecting law enforcement candidates by willingness to fuck up other citizens lives over literally nothing, and here we are.

Even if we started today with an Apollo Program level of commitment to rehabilitating our society's public service talent pool, it would take a generation to see the results. But we're not even starting, so it'll just get worse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The best argument I've read is that nobody in their right mind would want to be in a position of authority. You're constantly criticised by everyone around you and receive hardly anymore compensation than rank and file workers. It's why sociopaths and power hungry narcissists tend to fill authority positions.