this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
207 points (98.1% liked)

News

23530 readers
6660 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Military leaders are rattled by a list of “woke” senior officers that a conservative group urged Pete Hegseth to dismiss for promoting diversity in the ranks if he is confirmed to lead the Pentagon.

The list compiled by the American Accountability Foundation includes 20 general officers or senior admirals and a disproportionate number of female officers. It has had a chilling effect on the Pentagon’s often frank discussions as leaders try to figure out how to address the potential firings and diversity issues under President-elect Donald Trump.

Those on the list in many cases seem to be targeted for public comments they made either in interviews or at events on diversity, and in some cases for retweeting posts that promote diversity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChonkyOwlbear 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They are a dark money group, so they hide their donors. The founders are Ted Cruz's PR guy and a personnel guy from Trump's presidency. It was created in 2020 specifically to obstruct Biden.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How much are you willing to bet that a good amount of its money can be traded back to Russia?

Russia may be done for militarily, but their spy businesses are booming

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 4 points 3 days ago

It's an offshoot of a group Paul Manafort has worked for since the end of the Trump presidency, so I would say that's a sure bet.

[–] DomeGuy 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They are a dark money group, so their motives should be presumed nefarious.

No good actor needs to hide their actions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, but just in case, this is literally the "if you're not doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to hide" argument that authoritarian govts constantly use to ban proper encryption and any form of privacy.

[–] DomeGuy 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you cant see the difference between personal privacy and political anonymity, consider the difference in a court of law. Your privacy means not having to take the stand, while piercing anonymnity is necessary to rebut the accusations others make against you.

You can be private if you want to be left alone, but if you want the government to intercede on your behalf you should need to make clear who you are.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right, which is why your attempt at a generalized statement was not inaccurate. It is not the case that "no good actor needs to hide their actions".

[–] DomeGuy 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Context matters. Always, in all things, but especially language. (i can rant about tomatoes if i need to.)

While i can see that you might think i was making a general statement, i feel confident that the context makes it clear that "actor" applies specifically to persons engaging in political persuasion by propogating advertisements or financing lobbyists.

Still, in the interests of clarity, let me re-state the maxim with the context more explicit:

In politics, no good actor needs to hide their actions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Contextually, it didn't read like you were saying "only for people holding/affecting public office", it read like a universal statement of the form: "No X are Y"

I'm glad we agree. And in addition to context, clarity matters in language. Historically, it's not an absurdly slippery slope to go from "these politicians are corrupt" to "privacy is for terrorists!" Overly simplifying our choice of language can foster undesired radicalization.

Cheers