Science Memes

11354 readers

3037 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

954

[Evidence Inconclusive] Germ Blaster (mander.xyz)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Valmond 52 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is this true? Seriously curious.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Unfortunately it is very much true.

Edit: here's a more recent source.

[–] daddy32 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

This is not hot air though, so the cited source does not apply.

Edit: but it does link to more relevant study towards the end, comparing different means of hand drying.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You're right and I linked a fairly old study. I've edited my comment to add a more recent source.

[–] daddy32 21 points 5 days ago

Kudos.

[–] kautau 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Findings: Air bacterial counts in close proximity to hand drying were 4.5-fold higher for the jet air dryer (70.7 cfu) compared with the warm air dryer (15.7 cfu) (P=0.001), and 27-fold higher compared with use of paper towels (2.6 cfu) (P<0.001).* Airborne counts were also significantly different during use of towel drying versus warm air dryer (P=0.001). A similar pattern was seen for bacterial counts at 1m away. Visualization experiments demonstrated that the jet air dryer caused the most droplet dispersal.

[–] SmoothOperator 4 points 5 days ago

Isn't the point to get bacteria off your hands? Isn't it better to have them in the air than on your hands?

It's a lot more likely I'll eat something I touched than something that's been sitting in bathroom air.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

They used a jet air dryer, those are the shitty ones that spray everything everywhere. Of course it'll be worse. I'd like to see how a dyson air blade hold up under that kind of test.