this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
471 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9787 readers
1201 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
471
1979 (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by FlyingSquid to c/fuckcars
 

Today, from Amtrak's website:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

what... I know that you don't have much in the way of public transit but... you remove what little you have now?

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh this is nothing. Read up on the streetcars. The country basically removed most of its mass transit light rail because the car companies weren't selling enough cars.

They didn't even do it in smart ways. This town just paved over the tracks. Now, 80 years later or whatever it is, the streets are caving in and they have to do all these expensive repairs.

[–] FireRetardant 8 points 1 week ago

Not only that, but most cities will claim they aren't big enough to support a tram, despite nearly every city having trams 100 years ago

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Believe it or not the US actually has one of the largest rail networks in the world still. Passenger rail is just not popular.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While true, I would add that a big reason is that freight is prioritised by rail companies, causing large and frequent delays for passengers. Amtrak owns some of its own rail, mostly in the northeast, which is perhaps less-than-coincidentally the part of the US that has the most people taking trains.

[–] pyre 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

that's because it's a continent. comparing it to other countries by route km is ridiculous. if you look at coverage, or population per km it's absolutely abysmal. the US comes 132nd per population covered. not to mention 80% of the network is freight lines. so it's the same old: because it's a good thing, it's mostly there for corporations.