this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
151 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39212 readers
3506 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

South Korea's main opposition party has called for President Yoon Suk Yeol to resign or face impeachment after his six-hour martial law declaration, deemed unconstitutional.

Yoon’s move, the first martial law since the 1980s, involved deploying troops to encircle parliament but was swiftly overturned by a 190-0 vote in the opposition-controlled legislature.

Critics, including U.S. officials, condemned the action as a democratic setback.

The Democratic Party, holding 192 seats with allies, may pursue impeachment, recalling South Korea’s history of ousting presidents through public and legislative pressure.

Yoon has yet to publicly respond.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

This was maybe the most pathetic coup attempt in recent years (excluding jan 6th and brazil's jan 8th because they both wouldn't have worked as actual coups regardless). At least some part of the military was clearly in on it too, but they didn't even stop the representatives from voting to invalidate the declaration, and even worse, it was attempted while the opposition nearly had a supermajority, and with an incredibly disliked president.

Maybe this is overthinking it, but why would you ever try a coup without at least some popular support? Yeah, it doesn't matter what the people think as far as making it happen, but lack of popular support often leads to a lot of instability, and the first one to die in an unstable dictatorship is often the guy at the top.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

I think the Brazilian coup was actually more viable than you might think, he probably could have pulled it off if it wasn't for a small handful of military members who refused to take part.

Jan 6th was pathetic fr though

I've been baffled by this south Korean attempt, too, though. The consensus seems to be that he'd assumed his own party would back him (which presumably would have been enough that the opposition couldn't form a majority against his declaration). I suppose he must have had strong military support to be so (overly) confident.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Smells a bit like distraction, but being entirely ignorant of South Korean politics, no idea for what.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

I love how people explain everything in politics as "a distraction".