College Football

859 readers

6 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

/c/CFB Poll Top 25
1. Oregon
2. Texas
3. Notre Dame
4. Penn State
5. ~~SMU~~
6. Ohio State
7. ~~Indiana~~
8. Georgia
9. ~~Tennessee~~
10. South Carolina
11. Arizona State
12. Boise State
13. Alabama
14. Ole Miss
T-15. Iowa State
T-15. Miami
17. BYU
18. ~~Clemson~~
19. ~~Army~~
20. Colorado
T-21. Syracuse
T-21. UNLV
23. Louisville
24. Illinois
25. Baylor

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ohio State Possible Suspensions (self.cfb)

submitted 3 weeks ago by TheCelticPirate to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Florida State was left out of the playoffs last year because one player was out. If Ohio State players get suspended for attacking the Michigan players after the game, should they also be left out of the playoffs? Some of the players involved were significant starters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WVbrU 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Agreed on banning flag planting. It's literally unsportsmanlike conduct and vandalism even.

I was shocked to see so many people on other forum defending or even condoning the practice.

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't actually have a problem with the flag planting, though I totally agree that it was the catalyst for both the incidents you are referring to. I also honestly don't really have a problem with Ryan Day's response, though I understand why people say that it is lame (and I don't disagree with them either). I don't even really have a huge problem with the buckeye's response itself as let's be honest it was mostly just pushing and jawing, though this aspect is certainly the closest in my eyes the incident is to crossing a line (there were some full swings and that's passing a line even in my book). But at the end of the day I don't have a problem with people being emotional about these games and displaying some of those emotions physically (chirping, pushing, flag planting etc). To be clear just because I don't have a problem with some of the actions, doesn't mean I don't understand that they are dangerous and against a set of rules so there absolutely should be some sort of repercussions. I think this also includes the officers that maced people after the scuffle was broken up. I also don't want it to sound like I'm defending the buckeyes or Day. They come off as losers from this in my eyes, but its also not like flag planting is actually a cool way to celebrate a win. Do something cool like that DIII? match up where the winner points a statue towards their school if they win.

[–] WVbrU 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To be clear, I don't think a team should be left out of the playoffs for something like that. Since it occurs after the game, it seems like a fine to the offending school makes the most sense (and may already exist). Beyond that, maybe a half/whole game suspension for the player and/or coach?

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think fine both schools, have any players that crossed physical lines sit out a half and maybe an extra fine for Day? But I wouldn't go so far as to ban flag planting. Those cops are off the game staff, no more sideline views for them. I'd still listen to an argument for keeping OSU out of the tournament based solely on on the field arguments though. Anemic doesn't even begin to describe their presence yesterday and Michigan is not good this year.

[–] Omegamanthethird 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I 100% support flag planting, or walking on the logo, or whatever as long as it's not directed at specific people. That's how taunting has always been handled, and that's how it should continue to be handled. Home teams rush the field, away teams get to plant the flag (or trident in ASU's case).

To the losing home team, mind your own fucking business and let people celebrate. The winning team isn't responsible for their behavior.