this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
521 points (99.1% liked)

News

23407 readers
5106 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure what you are responding to. Your response is kind of vague. Voters are saying they voted on the economy and immigration among other issues. Trump was speaking to these issues while Kamala was not.

[–] nomous -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Other voters in swing states had real issues with

I'm not sure those voters exist. Lemmy thinks that they do but i don't see any evidence that they're real people.

At any rate there's little difference between not-voting and not-existing in the grand scheme so now we get to see what happens when an unashamed fascist wins and surrounds himself with yes men.

Unless those principled non-voters are ready to arm themselves and actually agitate, they might as well not exist and we can proceed accordingly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I still don’t understand your point.

All you’re doing is continuing to shame voters who didn’t vote for your candidate, even after these voters told your candidate what their priorities were.

The only substantial thing Kamala ran on was that she wasn’t Trump. Outside of not being Trump she is a shell of a human being who has no real values and will always change her views based on the campaign contributions she receives. Voters saw through her fake personality.

Continuing to try and shame voters for not supporting your candidate isn’t going to accomplish anything, much in the same way Obama and Hillary trying to shame voters accomplished little as well.

The DNC can’t even beat a buffoon like Trump because they are so bought and paid for by corporate and dark money PACs.

Maybe try stop trying to blame voters and focus your energies in that direction.

[–] nomous -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with anything you've said except.

Continuing to try and shame voters for not supporting your candidate isn’t going to accomplish anything

Who was MY candidate? I had to vote for the same milquetoast dem every other functional adult did. I weighed the options and made a decision. If some hypothetical non-voters think they have a better solution let's see it, they should be ashamed. Sitting in basements screeching online doesn't accomplish anything so let's fucking go.

I'm just waiting for the revolution to start, that's what we all want right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shaming voters won’t accomplish anything.

Fundamentally you are shaming voters for bad decisions that your candidate made.

The culpability for losing falls completely on Harris and the DNC, not on anyone else.

Shaming people for not voting for your candidate will push people away rather than recruit more voters to your side.

If you’d rather scream and shout from your soap box shaming voters who are traditionally on your side, feel free. Just know that you will be doing more actual harm for your cause than even any of the non voters did.

[–] nomous -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm shaming dumbfuck voters, abstainers, and the DNC.

Start the revolution or roll over and take it unlubed, we're all waiting.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, shaming voters that you want to be on your side is a losing strategy.

Kamala can gtfo of here, if she never appears on the political stage again it will be too soon.

The leadership of the DNC does not speak for the voters.

Shaming voters is a losing strategy.

Demanding accountability from the DNC is 100% what’s needed.

I don’t have a clue what you are referring to with these vague references of revolution, but again, shaming voters is and always will be a losing strategy.

[–] nomous -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

shaming voters is and always will be a losing strategy.

That's fine, I'm not a strategist or PR freak. I'm some random person on the internet.

I don’t have a clue what you are referring to with these vague references of revolution,

I'm not 100% sure either but I bet we're gonna find out over the next decade or so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Even among your friends and family, shaming is not usually a good strategy.

I think even if your puppy pees or poops on the rug shaming is a losing strategy.

[–] Keeponstalin 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's much better to actually discuss the root issues, which are usually related to cost of living, and then talk about the best way to resolve those material issues, which goes back to how progressive policies are popular across the board for Americans. The main issue for the DNC, is those policies come at the expense of the capital interests of the donor / business class.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Can’t usually see the roots though

But to be fair, roots is a good movie

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I, too, am a random internet stranger! 👋