this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
581 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19125 readers
2608 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Wednesday, the US Senate will hold a vote on whether to approve the Pentagon’s request to send another $20bn in armaments to Israel, after a year in which the Biden administration has supplied billions of dollars of arms used in Israel's devastating war on Gaza.

Among the weapons to be approved are 120mm tank rounds, high explosive mortar rounds, F-15IA fighter aircraft, and joint direct attack munitions, known as JDAMs, which are precision systems for otherwise indiscriminate or "dumb" bombs.

Separate resolutions are being brought forward for each weapon type, including its cost to US taxpayers. However, together, the initiative is known as the Joint Resolutions of Disapproval (JRDs).

As a result of intensive lobbying from pro-Israel groups like Aipac and the Democratic Majority For Israel, no arms transfer to Israel has been blocked.

The resolutions likely to gain the highest levels of support are expected to involve the tank rounds, which have been responsible for killing hundreds of civilians in northern Gaza in particular, and the JDAMs, which caused the death of well-known figures such as Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah in southern Lebanon, and six-year-old Hind Rajab in Gaza City.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We have that...

Like, you don't need to convince voters that shit is broken, everyone is well aware shit is broken.

There's just not an option that will honestly try to fix the root problem fucking everything up:

Wealth Inequality

When both parties are pro-corps and anti-worker...

The problem isn't growing a movement of voters, it's finding a way to get a candidate past the primary so they can win the general.

Every election there's two fights:

  1. Fight the DNC moderates in the primary

  2. Fight the Republicans and the DNC moderates in the general

If we don't win the first one, there's a very strong chance the candidate who makes it to the general won't be able to beat the Republican in the general. Because they're not what the politically disengaged want.

The good news tho is that there is very very few voters who would even want to pull another PUMA and vote R in the general if a progressive makes it. Some will 100% try it. And the media will shit their pants trying to convince us it won't work.

But it can still work just as well today as it did 16 years ago when they voted R instead of for a Black guy with a progressive campaign.

There's very few neoliberal voters, it's just the people running the party pretend that's the base.

[–] aesthelete -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

We have that…

We absolutely do not have that. We have a couch-dwelling population that hasn't been civically engaged in a meaningful way in fifty years and running. Social capital has atrophied since the 60s by every discernible metric.

[–] givesomefucks 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe with the people you spend time with.

But lots of people are putting work in, all over the country.

Just don't expect to hear about it from the party, or any of the big media organizations owned by billionaires for the express purpose of maintaining the status quo so they can keep their ill gotten wealth.

Quick edit:

Not sure why you're talking about the 60s like everyone was hippies...

The majority of the population back then was fighting school busing like Biden was to preserve segregation, or the ones screaming insults and throwing rocks at children for going to the school they were told to attend.

Like, it's important to understand the present, but you can't do that when you're obviously confused about the past...

[–] aesthelete 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Maybe with the people you spend time with.

If you're spending your time with a large amount of civically involved, mutual-aid-providing people in America, you're actually in the minority.

EDIT: Not sure why you’re talking about the 60s like everyone was hippies…

EDIT: Because I'm talking about statistical measures of things. Not feels and vibes like you're thinking. It's a well-studied subject, but I know nobody believes in reading or studying anymore.