politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Americans rejected the middle. They want someone who says they will take a stand against the status quo. The argument isn't any more complex than that.
The Obama vote (change you can believe in) and Trump vote are similar in their popular message at the root of it.
When people lose hope in a system the person who promises to break it down wins. Does not matter that it's a charlatan or a champion.
I'd like to think people would actively prefer a champion to a charlatan, but when the Democratic Party abjectly refuses to offer a champion and says "fuck you" to anybody who tries, well, a charlatan is the only other option.
Totally agree though I do think there's some nuance in exactly what the status quo meant to each Trump voter.
For Christian fundamentalists, it meant a secular society and abortion rights
For the working class it was high inflation
For young straight men (and their parents) it was a felt sense that they were being cancelled
For the suburban voters it was the felt sense that we have porous borders and that our tax dollars were being used to support non-citizen
Not all of these are accurate, but simply being told you're wrong before feeling like the other person is taking you seriously is only going to drive you to folks who will tell you what you want to hear. And that's where the disinformation comes in
We have to do better at listening to the other side's concerns and offering meaningful answers. I don't just mean offering policy as a response, I mean they have to feel heard before they are going to be willing to listen
These are just different misinterpretations of the same underlying problem. What both groups are experiencing is a feeling of economic instability and being left behind while the rich get richer. But Americans have been so heavily propagandized to for decades that we don't have the political vocabulary to describe the real solution (at least not without using swear words like "s*****ism"), so we grope for some related issue to provide framing. And, of course, very often what we find is some scapegoat the ruling class' propaganda has 'helpfully' provided to us in order to deflect their blame.
I don't disagree. Just describing it from their perspectives. The root issue is that the entire political system is beholden to corporate interests and there's not enough political will to change that. But the average voter doesn't care about the system of government so long as they can afford to pay groceries and they feel that their interests matter. Whether neoliberalism, socialism, fascism, this election shows that the average voter cares less about the system than the results
I think it’s even simpler. Biden and the RNC decided ‘actions speak louder than words’ in 2020 so the GQP promptly filled the information space with bullshit and lies. It was already over by the time Biden announced his reelection bid.
Genocide is not a middle position. Neither is liberalism. Dems are right-wing. Nowhere close to the middle.
The main difference between dems and republicans is the overt racism, sexism, etc.. That's the difference between obama and trump. That's what separates actual populism from right-wing fascism.
Unfortunately we've learned (and will learn over the next year) that there is a sick difference between status quo genocide and turbo active genocide.
This comment is not approving of EITHER but we are about to get our fill of WORSE