this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
361 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2626 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Mike Davis, a Trump adviser and possible nominee for attorney general, issued a threatening warning to New York Attorney General Letitia James, who sued Trump for business fraud, not to continue her legal actions against him in his second term, threatening to put her in prison.

Davis’s inflammatory remarks, including personal insults, come as James has vowed to defend Americans against any unconstitutional actions by the new administration.

Known for his extreme rhetoric, Davis has previously suggested punishing journalists and Trump’s political opponents harshly, though it’s often unclear when he’s serious.

Trump has hinted at a significant role for Davis in his administration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kescusay 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

She did. A lot. You weren't listening. You were too busy trying to both-sides this shit.

You got Trump. Congrats.

[–] seaQueue 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah, we're still in the blame everyone phase of the defeat aren't we.

Usually when you lose a popularity contest the thing to do is ask what the other side did better, not blame everyone else for being wrong.

I voted for Harris. Biden and Clinton 2 - at the time they were the least bad option of the two presented. That wasn't enough for a lot of people and we should probably start trying to understand why.

[–] hohoho 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The other side did propaganda, lies, and criminal activity better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, and a couple dudes missed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One of them never even took a shot, can't even class that as an assassination attempt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

He just got a little excited and the barrel peeked out, at least he tried dammit.

[–] seaQueue 0 points 2 weeks ago

The other side did propaganda, lies, and criminal activity better.

So learn what messages the public wants to hear, it's obviously not "we'll keep doing what we've been doing." Maybe take a different tack with the propaganda instead of "you should be ashamed we weren't elected"

[–] Ensign_Crab 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Clearly we didn't move to the right enough or scream enough abuse at the left.

[–] seaQueue -1 points 2 weeks ago

Surely if we just shame our supporters harder we'll win next time