this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
86 points (93.0% liked)

politics

19149 readers
4221 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

This victory makes Trump the first U.S. president to serve non-consecutive terms since Grover Cleveland and the first with a criminal conviction to hold office.

Democrats were shocked by the loss, particularly as exit polls revealed significant shifts among key demographics: Latino men favored Trump by 10 points, and more voters identified as independents or unaffiliated.

The economy was the top priority for Trump supporters, while Harris voters emphasized democracy and abortion rights.

The election also showed increased dissatisfaction with the country’s direction, as 72% of voters expressed anger or frustration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus 97 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

The answer was you spent the last 3 months fucking your chances by chasing republican votes instead of rallying your own base. Its not rocket science. That shit was not inspiring.

[–] halcyoncmdr 50 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Not only that, it was clear Trump was gaining voters because he said, "yeah, shit's fucked, I'll change it" and the Dems kept insisting "it's really not that bad". To people who have it hard, one party telling you that you're just wrong and nothing will change, and the other saying they'll change things for the better is a pretty obvious choice. Even if they're lying about making it better, it's already bad, and your other option is the same bad, why not give it a try?

[–] Sanctus 43 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Seriously, it was easy to see this election was going to whoever was promising extreme changes. The Democrats once again lost an easy victory because... Well I'm gonna be real Idfk. How the fuck you not have this in the bag?

"I'll make homes affordable again by banning investment housing and corporate ownership"

"I'll end the wars in Israel, and I'll help Ukraine knock our oldest enemy for the cheap, saving American lives."

"And I'll fucking invigorate the middle class by tying minimum wage to inflation, guaranteeing you won't fall behind."

Its that easy. Say that shit, and when asked what you'd do differently than your predecessor, always say "a lot". It gives you an opportunity to attack easy problems. I've lost all of my mind at this. I have no idea how the Democrats do this shit every fucking time.

[–] Fredselfish 3 points 3 weeks ago

Because their owners won't allow them to fuck with their wealth.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)