fedia shitpost

Taiwan & Hong Kong

And Ukraine

Both the Republican and Democrat candidate were and are in favor of violence in various places around the globe. Either person was a vote for death.

Actually, it's very hard not to vote for death, because when you have wars that other people are fighting in other countries, you can't just snap your fingers and have the death magically disappear. It just doesn't work that way. That's not to say that the president has no power, but the president certainly doesn't have the power to guarantee that the death stops now.

Now if you want to make a statistical argument that Trump is likely to lead to more death than Harris, go for it. And maybe you can do a good job with that, but you're starting off by trying to argue about speculative future death compared with actual past death. If you're into statistics, I highly encourage you to crunch the numbers and then post your data here.

I've previously asked something similar in a different post like a week ago. Why do people keep referring to Hong Kong as a place the US could intervene?

Taiwan, I understand, the status there is unclear and the US sells weapons and provides other military aid.

Hong Kong though? What exactly are people imagining the US would do under any administration, when most countries have the One China Principle (including the US) as official foreign policy?

As much as the people of Hong Kong may or may not like it depending on their own views, basically no country has come out in support of any independence for the region. Like it or not, Hong Kong is part of China, and I don't foresee any country seriously intervening in any way in China's one country, now more like 1.5 systems, 2 systems arrangement.

Can someone explain this random talking point? I just don't understand.

You rolled over on your back and told the dems you'd vote for them no matter what while they were actively funding a genocide. It's on you