this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
1526 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

5826 readers
1708 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 142 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Divorce rate may be too low.

[–] Droggelbecher 57 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's that the marriage rate has been too high for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That, and people become economicly dependent. They tried UBI when Nixon was president (I know right) and it was considered a failure because the divorce rate went up. What later studies showed was that the divorce rate went up because women in abusive or dead end relationships were finally empowered to leave the spouses they had become depend on.

[–] blazeknave 15 points 3 months ago

Successful experiment for them. Prove economic suppression was working to keep women abused carrying babies. Checked clipboard, doubled down.

[–] InverseParallax 4 points 3 months ago

And if women voted as often as they should this wouldn't be considered a political failure

[–] Num10ck 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago

Might be a good idea to divorce now before the conservative supreme court screws up that option too.

[–] InverseParallax 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's that large parts of the country are an absolute dystopia, all the jobs are either physically demanding, or service-related.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

why is that related to divorce rates?

[–] InverseParallax 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Women can't get the high paying jobs traditionally performed by men, making them financially dependent.

[–] Buddahriffic 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget the abortion angle, combined with the healthcare and housing angles. Add in the poor public education angle and you've got a vicious cycle creating dependence on men and new generations of people with fewer resources to avoid getting caught in that cycle themselves.

[–] InverseParallax 2 points 3 months ago

Also just the assumption of gender roles where women are expected to still be stay at home moms while mem are expected to provide, which is far more entrenched in the south, it's actually a religious commandment to them.