this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
561 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9797 readers
357 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatouKazuma 10 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Ditching cars should be done everywhere (not just in populated cities).

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (16 children)

do you really expect people in rural areas to ditch cars?

will they go back to carts and horses?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (14 children)

The US used to have a comprehensive rail network. Every single town had a train station. We already had the solution to this problem.

[–] Takumidesh 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I live in a rail hub in the us. The city is nicknamed after it and train tracks literally run through the city center.

It would take me 6 hours to walk there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it takes 6 hours to walk across your city it's not rural. Your city needs comprehensive public transportation.

[–] Sludgehammer 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think he means it would take six hours of walking to reach his city. I mean I live four miles outside of town (which incidentally I'd need to travel to to reach a railroad) and even though it's smaller than 3000 people it still calls its self a "city". Also I'd like to note it's four miles of hilly terrain, which depending on season may feature hundred degree plus temperatures or foot deep snow.

[–] AA5B 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I live about ten miles outside the nearby city.

However my town has a train station. From my neighborhood of single family homes, I can walk about 20 minutes, or a bus drives by regularly to get me to the town center which includes the train station

I’m certainly not rural, but there’s no reason my scenario can’t apply to 80% of the population if more cities/towns were designed for it.

And this is in the US

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Please tell me you're exaggerating. I live in a small city and it only takes me maybe an hour to walk across town. If it's taking you 6 hours, it's not rural.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)