this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1766 points (97.6% liked)

Political Memes

5387 readers
4492 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrslt 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, because the orange guy is completely scandal-free, am I right? /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And how does that change the fact that the post says there aren't any? Last time I checked 1 is more than 0.

[–] nomous 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If something affects both sides it's effectively "a wash" and cancel each other out.

Unless you have weird double standards and only apply them when it's convenient.

[–] Cleggory -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If something affects both sides it's effectively "a wash" and cancel each other out.

It's called mental gymnastics to think "two wrongs make a right."

[–] nomous 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

an argument that was never made

It says 0 scandals right there in the post

Just because the other guy also has scandals doesn't mean she has 0

[–] Cleggory 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You didn't make this absurd claim?:

If something affects both sides it's effectively "a wash" and cancel each other out.

If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize "to cancel it out"?

[–] nomous 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Context is important, that's how we continue the conversation.

If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It's effectively a wash and pointless to say "well Candidate A supports genocide!"

Hope this clarified my meaning.

[–] Cleggory 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

[–] nomous 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own *farts so go off.

Whatever helps you sleep at night

[–] Cleggory 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apathy was too big of a word for you??

[–] nomous 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh I know lots of defintions. It's especially useful sniffing out self important jackasses who love to read their own words.

[–] Cleggory 1 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)

[–] nomous 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't work in this context

one just is a worse murderer

Seems like it works just fine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So are you agreeing with what I said about both people being murderers or not? Because of you are then you agree that it isn't a wash, and if you disagree then you are fucking stupid.

[–] nomous 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is two murders worse than one?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Yes obviously, but it doesn't excuse the other.